Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />1 -5 -12 <br />7.14 Schematic Design <br />11/17/11 <br />PBC requested that some discussion take place with DDP and PBC over design styles and aesthetics as the architects should be <br />aware of what general direction the PBC feels the design should be so as not to waste valuable and limited time in design phase. <br />DDP stated that SD deliverables would include: <br />Cost Estimates, Narrative on Systems, Narrative on Site, Narrative on finishes, Plans, Elevations, sections, Rendering and permitting <br />issues <br />12/1/11 <br />DDP expressed that the design phase would be beginning and there was general discussion on the design, historical elements and <br />their impact on design in Lexington and other design features. PBC suggested that the architects not cast the design features too <br />quickly until they make some suggestions to the PBC to confirm an appropriate direction. <br />12/15/12 <br />PBC wants to be sure that DDP meets with PBC at least three times in January to have an opportunity to review and comment on <br />design decisions. <br />PBC would like to see 3d modeling of school with topography and perhaps a view from Grove Street. <br />1/5/12 <br />DDP made presentation on design issues and process forthcoming. Overall massing discussed along with a few design issues <br />such as: <br />The roof equipment screening location and height <br />Possible roof garden area <br />Roof access hatch or door (penthouse) <br />Two story space over library <br />Approx 4000 sf of basement, required, is slab on grade more cost effective? <br />Size of gymnasium, as compared to other elementary schools <br />Canopy in front of school <br />Canopies in other locations around schools <br />PBC would like to see these items as breakouts on the estimate so that they can understand cost impact on the project. <br />DDP stressed that schematic design will not stop after SD submission to MSBA, rather there will be opportunity to further work <br />with PBC on Design issues thru design development. <br />DPC discussed need to be able to deduct from approved design not try to add too it. <br />7.15 LEED <br />12/1/11 <br />Brief discussion on LEED design. DDP expressed that MSBA reimburses 2% for LEED Silver certification the first pass thru the LEED <br />scorecard should occur in the schematic design phase. <br />1/5/12 <br />Draft of LEED scorecard will be at next meeting <br />7.16 Mosaic <br />12/1/11 <br />There has been discussion about saving the Estabrook logo mosaic, so the construction of the mosaic is being tested for <br />contaminants during December break. <br />7.17 Traffic Clarification <br />12/8/11 <br />PBC discussed the need for clarification as to the extent of involvement of the ETF committee with traffic concerns on the Estabrook <br />site. Peter Johnson will communicate a reminder to the ETF that the PBC has responsibility for oversight of traffic concerns within <br />the Estabrook site and that while they will seek a recommendation from the ETF on the amount of queuing that may be required <br />based upon their work leading to the property line, it is the PBC who should coordinate the actual design and layout of this work on <br />site with the architect and traffic consultant. <br />1/5/12 <br />ETF has not met since the 12/8/11 PBC discussion above. <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />