Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />1 -5 -12 <br />7.0 Estabrook Elementary <br />7.8 Estimates <br />9/8/11 <br />PBC requested info on estimates in Schematic Design. RF Walsh stated that there was one completed by the architect and one <br />completed by Walsh. <br />RF Walsh advised that the MSBA limits reimbursement on site work to +/- 8% of building costs, so town may have reduced <br />reimbursement if site costs are in excess of the limit. <br />10/27/11 <br />It was reported that very early cost modeling was showing the Estabrook project cost in the ballpark of 36 to 37.5 million <br />12/15/11 <br />Cost Summary tables were presented by RF Walsh, dated 15 December 2011, for various design options, with a cost range of <br />$38,894,133 to 42,783,546 for the preferred option 3C. <br />General discussion on overall costs took place along with discussion on reimbursement percentages from the state. There was some <br />discussion from the PBC that Walsh and DiNisco should be cognizant of % of reimbursement and not position the project such that <br />expected reimbursements reduce. <br />It was discussed that the furniture and technology allowances by MSBA may not serve full needs of school and may require <br />increases. <br />1/5/12 <br />Two cost estimates will be developed for schematic design phase and will be reviewed with PBC on 1/26/12 meeting, but the <br />two estimates will not be reconciled by that night. <br />7.9 Schedule <br />Received schedule 9115111, designer agreement should be resolved by early next week. PBC would like to see a copy. <br />10/27/11 <br />March 2012 — MSBA Approval <br />January 2013 — Start of Construction <br />September 2014 - Occupy Building <br />1/5/12 <br />ECC meeting in February and PBC would like to hear what feedback was from ECC. <br />7.10 CM at Risk versus Design Bid Build <br />For the purposes of reducing ongoing printed text, previous entries under this heading may have been removed from current <br />meeting minutes. Please refer to previous editions of the minutes for older insertions. <br />12/8/11 <br />There was continued discussion on the CM @ risk process which included the review of a table of data presented by RF Walsh on the <br />shifting of responsibilities of participants in the project management process as well as financial and scheduling impacts. Given the <br />potential of negligible cost differentials and potential improvement to scheduling and tighter document development the PBC <br />elected to continue the project with the CM at Risk process. <br />Motion to approve and implement the Construction Manager @ Risk process on the Estabrook School project, understanding <br />that improvements to scheduling, document and construction control provided through the construction manager at risk process <br />will be an added benefit to the project. <br />Motion: Phil Coleman 2" d : Dick Perry Vote: Unanimous <br />12/15/11 <br />Minor discussion on possible cost impacts to CM at Risk process versus cost or schedule savings but no changes to determinations <br />made to date. <br />1/5/12 <br />Need Sub - Committee for CM @Risk selection which needs 2 members of PBC. PBC would like to know scheduling commitment <br />needed for this sub - committee and to have this at next meeting. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />