Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />01 December 2011 Meeting <br />4.21ReviewofDesignDevelopmentEstimate <br />Forthepurposesofreducingongoingprintedtext,previousentriesunderthisheadingmayhavebeenremovedfromcurrent <br />meetingminutes.Pleaserefertopreviouseditionsoftheminutesforolderinsertions. <br />9/15/11 <br />PBCproposedchangingcontingencyfigureto10%now. <br />nd <br />Motion:PeterJohnson2:PhillipColemanUnanimous <br />10/13/11 <br />DPCpresentedan80%CDestimatedraftthatputstotalprojectcostat$22,875,027,howeverthereareseveralhundred <br />thousanddollarsreportedlytocomeoutbasedupontheirreviewtoacorrectedfigurewithinaweekorso. <br />PBCrequestedfullestimatecompleteby10/19forPBCmtg.on10/20withareconciliationofcostchangesfrom19.4to22.8 <br />Generaldiscussionfollowedonestimatepointsandwhatinformationisneededtojustifycostincreases.Noformalized <br />conclusions. <br />10/20/11 <br />Goalofthismeetingwastoreviewchangesincostestimate. <br />DPCpresentedanupdated80%costestimatetotaling$22,638,958. <br />DPCpresentedaTableshowingtheprimarycomponentsoftheestimate(itemsAthruH.)asitprogressedfromSD19.4million <br />to80%CD$22.6Million. <br />Therewasdiscussiononsomespecificcostchangesalongwithgeneraldiscussionontradesandallowances. <br />ClerkCostincreased$150,000duetodoubleshiftwork.Sprinklerswentup20%inlast2months. <br />DPCstatedthattheEstimatorcarried@$5.50sfvs.theEngineeroriginally@$4.40sfforsprinklerwork.Questionasked{Was <br />theproductivityrate7†Ò­·;7|jDPCdidnotknow. <br />PBCwouldliketoseemoredetailontheestimateandwhatincreasedthecost.Boardwouldlikeaspreadsheetthatshowsthe <br />16CSIdivisionsfromSDtoCD. <br />{IšÞdidestimatorincludecostofphasingintooverall-š­·|jDPCdidnotknow. <br />PBCwillreviewdatawhenreceivedandadviseiftheywanttohaveanothermeetingonthisissueandwhetherornotestimator <br />shouldcome. <br />10/27/11 <br />TheArchitectshadforwardedareconciliationofsomeofthecostchangesfromtheDD‘CDestimatebutthisdidnotreflect <br />causeforchangesfromSDDD.ByonemembersevaluationthemaintradesinvolvedweretheMEPtradeswithacostchangeof <br />approx.1.7millionfromSDtoCDandthatthebasisoftheestimateattheSDphasemaybetheculpritfortheincreases. <br />4.24Noise <br />8/23/11 <br />Itwasdiscussedifthenoiseordinancewouldprohibitdoubleshiftwork.DPFreportedthatwehavehaddoubleshiftworkatother <br />buildingswithoutcomplaint.Furtherthebuildingcommissionerhasstatedthereisnotaproblemwhentheworkisinsidethe <br />building.Furtherthefiredepartmenthasconfirmedthatithasnoimpactontheirregulations. <br />9/8/11 <br />DPCfeltthattownordinancewasinvolvedwithregulatingconstructionnoiseandthattheprojectmayneeddispensationfromBOS <br />forhoursofoperation.DPFwillfollowup. <br />DPCreportedthatabackgroundnoisemonitoring&modelingeffortwascompleted.Currentlytheconsultantisevaluatingoptions <br />onhowtoachievecompliancewithnoiseordinanceaswellasgoalofnochangetobackground.Currentlythereisanallowanceof <br />$25,000perschoolintheindirectcoststocoverfuturenoiseabatementifneeded. <br />10/13/11 <br />PBCdiscussedandelectedtodirectDPCtomakeprovisionsstructurally,forfuturesoundabatementscreensatnewrooftop <br />units. <br />TheIssueofmeetingthecoderequirementswhichallowsforasetincreaseinbackgroundnoiselevelsorhavingnochangein <br />backgroundlevelswasdiscussedalthoughnoformaldecisionwasmade. <br />4.26RoofTopUnitscreening <br />11/2/11 <br />Itwasreportedthattherooftophvacequipmentwouldbelargerthanoriginallyanticipatedandcouldbe18inchesto2feet <br />taller.Therewassomeconcernexpressedovertheaestheticsofthelargerunitsandtheoverallviewoftheschooltothepublic, <br />notwithstandinganysoundabatementconcerns.Variousoptionsforscreeningandplacementofsupportstructureforfuture <br />screeningwasdiscussed.Currentlysixunitssuspectedofaneedforscreeningbasedonsoundabatementweremodifiedto <br />includeroofreinforcingforfuturescreenpanels.Itwasdiscussedtoincreasethiscountto10toincludeunitswherescreens <br />maybedesiredforaestheticsaswell,howeverthismotionwasnotactedupon,leavingjusttheoriginal6locations <br />Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br />