Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />12 May 2011 Meeting <br />4.0 Bridge &Bowman Renovation Projects <br />4.4 LEED Certification <br />12/14/10 <br />The Project Architects outlined that LEED certification was not considered to be viable given the scope and nature of the proposed <br />work at Bridge and Bowman and recommended against pursuing the certification. The School Principals' thought that the funding <br />for LEED pursuits could be better suited to go towards items that will effect programming or educational issues. <br />4/14/11 <br />LEED was discussed and it was agreed that work should focus on energy aspects and incorporate into the specs those items that <br />can be incorporated in the spirit of LEED. Further that the last part of the last sentence of the LEED Ltr from DPC dated 23 <br />November 2010, should be followed.... "... we suggest designing all systems within the current scope to a standard that would be <br />required for LEED Certification but not add additional scope solely for the purposes of achieving certification." And report back <br />on what measures are being done. <br />4.5 Proiect Direction <br />12/14/10 <br />With the School Committees support of pursuing increased funding to expand the base scope of the project discussion ensued on the <br />paths of the project and if and how work could continue until the spring town meeting. The DPC suggested a fee increase would be <br />warranted in the area of $280,000 to accommodate the increased scope. Multiple scenarios were discussed concerning what scope <br />items could continue, scheduling paths and what work could be continued contractually. <br />Motion to recommend that project go dormant until additional funding is authorized for expanded scope or direction to continue <br />with original scope received. <br />Motion: Dick Perry 2nd: Carl Oldenburg Vote: 6 -0 <br />4.6 <br />2/10/11 <br />Discussion regarding the scheduling of the continued project, town meetings, construction sequencing and phasing schedule. Also, <br />the fee negotiation with DPC. PBC discussed Pat, Jon and Eric continuing with fee negotiation issues. <br />4/14/11 <br />By Next meeting DPC will have started work again and come to the next meting with updates. <br />4.7 <br />4/14/11 <br />Reported to PBC that Town Meeting supported expanded Fee article for Bridge and Bowman Project. <br />4.8 DPC Proiect Update <br />5/12/11 <br />Design Partnership provided a general overview of the project for 30% Design Development completion inclusive of expanded <br />scope. Primary topics of discussion were floor plan approval, phasing plan for construction and Window patterns and schedule. <br />At next meeting DPC will pin -up drawings for review and bring MEP Engineer. PBC would also like to review Division 1 specs <br />4.9 Approved Floor Plan <br />5/12/11 <br />Carl O. had been provided with current design floor plans and reviewed with the principals the details of the design plans, to <br />make recommendations back to the Architects on preferences or improvements to the plans to reflect final approved plans from <br />the user. It was reported that the plan presented back to the architects were 95% and the remaining deviations would be <br />minimal in nature such as the adjustment to a door swing or location based upon continued development of the project. <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />