2011-02-10-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PBC Meeting Minutes 10 February 2011 Meeting 10/12/10 It was discussed that in future contracts System Design Statements along with training requirements need to include design intent. 2.83 Front Walkway 9/14/10 DPF reported that DPW had a cost range of $13- 15,000 to install a sidewalk following the incoming driveway, instead of passing by the flagpole at the center. PBC felt that the work could be done for less money and should be bid instead of using the state vendor contract and that HKT had a responsibility to provide the town with design options and construction documents that could be put out to bid. PBC asked DPF to notify HKT on need to meet design /code requirements and that they should provide layouts /options (bike path is not a viable design option) to the PBC for review and that construction documents suitable for bid should be provided 10/12/10 Mark Barrett will contact Gary Rhodes for a memo on code violation. 11/9/10 Memo was sent to HKT and awaiting response. 12/14/10 HKT provided several sketches that would satisfy the requirement to connection the public sidewalk to the front entrance. The PBC elected to have Bill Hadley select a walkway plan from those presented, that he was satisfied with and get pricing to complete the work. 2.85 LEED Gold 12/14/10 HKT outlined that the project was 2 credits shy of a Gold certification for LEED and suggested costs of $6,000 to $7,000 to investigate and pursue those two additional credits with no guarantee of receiving them. The PBC elected to not pursue the extra credits. 2.86 Mechanics garage A/C 1/13/11 DPF requested that the PBC consider funding an approximate $8,500 engineering study and evaluation report on the provision of air - conditioning to the mechanics garage bays and sign shop at 201 Bedford street. The PBC denied action on the request to support the evaluation study. The PBC citied that it was not part of the original building scope and that they as a body had previously agreed that no further requests should be considered for the use of un- committed funds from the project, see item 2.2 above. 3.0 Cary Memorial Hall - Venue Improvement Study 3.2 Progress 11 -9 -10 It was reported that the project was initiating and that public Meetings were being scheduled to gather data on the use of the building. Page 4 of 6