Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />10 February 2011 Meeting <br />4.0 Bridge &Bowman Renovation Projects <br />4.4 Update from School Committee Meeting <br />12/14/10 <br />The committee was given an overview of the presentation that was shown to the School Committee in support of <br />additional scope items. <br />The School Committee recommended pursuing additional funding to incorporate the additional scope items. <br />4.4 LEED Certification <br />12/14/10 <br />The Project Architects outlined that LEED certification was not considered to be viable given the scope and nature <br />of the proposed work at Bridge and Bowman and recommended against pursuing the certification. The School <br />Principals' thought that the funding for LEED pursuits could be better suited to go towards items that will effect <br />programming or educational issues. <br />4.5 Project Direction <br />12/14/10 <br />With the School Committees support of pursuing increased funding to expand the base scope of the project <br />discussion ensued on the paths of the project and if and how work could continue until the spring town meeting. <br />The DPC suggested a fee increase would be warranted in the area of $280,000 to accommodate the increased <br />scope. Multiple scenarios were discussed concerning what scope items could continue, scheduling paths and what <br />work could be continued contractually. <br />Motion to recommend that project go dormant until additional funding is authorized for expanded scope or <br />direction to continue with original scope received. <br />Motion: Dick Perry 2 nd : Carl Oldenburg Vote: 6 -0 <br />4.6 <br />2/10/11 <br />Discussion regarding the scheduling of the continued project, town meetings, construction sequencing and phasing <br />schedule. Also, the fee negotiation with DPC. PBC discussed Pat, Jon and Eric continuing with fee negotiation <br />issues. <br />5.0 Fire and Police Study and Design <br />5.6 Written report / hard copy <br />8/10/10 <br />It was stated that the final submission of this study would be in the form of a final written document /manual. Further, that a <br />submission should be made constituting a progress submission for this final document as portions of the manual will likely be <br />needed for a submittal to the selectmen. <br />12/14/10 <br />Final report for the Fire Station was received. PBC recommends that Donham & Sweeney complete the Police Station report in the <br />some fashion as the fire station report and submit copies to PBC to review at next meeting. <br />2/10/11 <br />Feedback from Eric Brown, Bruce and the chiefs was sent to the architects. PBC would like an electronic copy of the <br />report. <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />