2019-11-18-CONCOM-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Responses of the Applicant: Mr. Kirby stated that they treated the potential jurisdictional stormwater island as a wetland by replicating it 3:1 on the property. If the Commission determines the wetland is jurisdictional, Athe applicant will have to request a waiver from the bylaw because they cannot replicate the wetland on the property 2:1. Mr. Cappellano stated that the employees will be parking in neighboring properties. Mr. Joseph stated that they can look into incorporating a vegetated roof. Mr. Kirby stated that they are increasing the amount of open space on the property. Mr. Cappellano stated that they intend to keep the walking bridge. The applicant stated that they can move the building outside the 25 foot buffer zone. On a motion by Mr. Langseth and seconded by Mr. Beuttell, the Commission voted 6-0 to continue the hearing until December 16, 2019 at the applicant's request. 7:47pm DEP XBLX NOI, 6 Moon Hill Road Applicant: Linda Pagani Project: Drainage modifications to approved project Documentation Submitted: - MassDEP Notice of Intent Application with attachments - Plans entitled, "As-Built Plan"prepared by Columbia Design Group, LLC, dated May 28, 2019 - Plans entitled, "Drainage Areas" - Original Notice of Intent Submittal for 6 Moon Hill DEP 201-655 BL 613 - Letter, From Peter Gammie, P.E., Re: Drainage Discussion—Pervious driveway, dated November 16, 2019 - Spreadsheet, Pagani Plant List—as of 2019 - Memo, entitled, "Improvements of Original Conditions of Property" by Linda Pagani - Engineering Memo from Michael Sprague, Engineering Dept. dated November 18, 2019 - Planting Plan for Pagani Residence, dated November 2019 Ms. Linda Pagani, homeowner, presented before the Commission. The original approved project was to construct an addition and driveway as well as wetlands replication. The constructed driveway was constructed as impervious rather than pervious as was approved. Their project engineer, Mr. Peter Gammie, submitted a letter stating that the engineering should accommodate for the mistake since extra trench drains were installed as well as a gravel bed that was constructed deeper than approved in the Order of Conditions. The total impervious area on the project that was approved after construction was decreased to result in a zero net increase in impervious surface area. The wetland vegetation details were submitted. Concerns of the Commission: The Commission needs to receive a positive engineering memo.