1957-05-27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

meeting on June 24. It was also requested that in the meantime Air. Hodgdon furnish evidence why he con- , si_dered the plan submitted as not requiring Planning Board approval under the subdivision control lair. McCORIMACK The Board took under consideration the appli- AAD BRUN cation of Paul J. McCormack and Albert C. Brun for tentative approval of a preliminary plan of land be- tween Maple and 1:1oburn streets and located adjacent to the Harrington School. Pir. Snow reported on his examination with Recreational Director Samborski of said land which had been previously discussed as a possible site for a playground. He stated that the Recreation Committee wished the Planning Board to obtain an option for the purchase of lour or five acres of said i'icCorm.-ack-Brun land adjacent to the Harrington School, the exact size to be determined by r. Snow after a detailed study indicating the best development for recreational purposes. Concerning the preliminary plan there was dis- cussed also the relocation of the street abutting the school site, said relocation to be recommended whether or not the proposed recreation site was to be acquired. Thereupon it was moved by -ir. Jaquith, seconded by Kr. Soule and unanimously ' VOTED: that the preliminary subdivision plan entitled "Plan Showing Proposed Lotting Land in Lexington -Kass.", dated Jan. 15, .1957, together with the application for tentative approval of preliminary plan dated Apr. 26, 1957 and submitted on April 29, 1957 be and hereby is approved subject to the conditions that an area for acquisition by the Tom for recreation purposes be set aside in the southeasterly side of the Property, that the street lay- out be adjusted to provide for said re- creation area and to conform to the Plan- ning Board's study plan for the neighbor- hood. 80.. T^:RD OF r. Snoi,%T reported on his findings in regard APPEALS to the Joseph Ponsignore petition ane. its relation future subdivision of the i,ionsignore land, showing to the Board previous studies made in April 1956 for 'Mr. Frissore in conjunction with the Battle View Park Realty Trust plans. It vas decided to take no action in regard to the 1onoignore petition but to point out for the benefit of both the Board of , Appeals and Mr. T,ionsignore the nossi bilities for the future development of the I onsignore lane', particu- larly in regard to fir. Monsitrnore's proposal.