Laserfiche WebLink
The Budget Summit is scheduled for September 13th Hastings will be included in the package the <br /> for the Fire HQ and LCP projects. <br /> • Site plans for Hasting were reviewed. It was discussed that repositioning the in a straighter <br /> design would be a cost savings. The parking lot loop has not changed. Access to the stage <br /> from the lobby was discussed. It was stated geothermal wells would be located in the <br /> playground and playfield areas. <br /> • The roof plan maximizes solar and adding solar to the lower roof above the cafeteria is being <br /> evaluated for efficiency. A ballasted roof system is being evaluated. <br /> • The Solar Design Study for Parking Lot Solar Canopies was discussed. Due to stringent <br /> storm water requirements, the committee was informed a canopy system would require <br /> significant structural and underground drainage infrastructure. The project cannot afford to <br /> lose parking spaces. Further discussion will be needed. <br /> PBC inquired about financial meetings prior to Town Meeting based on what schematic costing. <br /> More discussion and updating is needed before Sept. <br /> DPF stated the budget is approved by MSBA and will go to the Town Meeting. $65,279,000 was <br /> voted on at MSBA with a V.E process underway. DOER program opens Sept. 2017 and includes <br /> incentives to build solar canopy systems. <br /> 3. LCP/Pelham Road Update —Rick Rice (DiNisco Design). Semoon Oh (VAV International). <br /> Rick reviewed schematic design and project costs in his slide presentation. He is working through <br /> developing a plan to open up conceptually, to provide enough information for cost estimating. An <br /> alternate layout was also discussed. <br /> • The building is no longer a ridged "L" shape to work with Police/Fire access. Vernal pool <br /> setbacks cannot be pushed back. <br /> • Alternative layout showed opening the main waiting area would be a good way for students <br /> to get to the play area out back, but has limitations. Further discussion will be needed. <br /> • The square footage between the two designs is about the same, but future expansion size is <br /> smaller on the alternative plan due to wetlands and parking. <br /> PBC questioned if we are creating a future problem if expansion is needed. Discussion?? It was <br /> asked if it makes sense to flip the building to provide for future expansion without having an impact <br /> on wetlands. <br /> PBC asked if a solar impactor shading studies have been done - Not as of yet. <br /> Green Initiatives <br /> Semoon reviewed Green Initiatives for a VRF system and a VRF with an ERU electric heat <br /> information in his slide presentation. <br /> It was commented that ambient sound and acoustical requirements for children are pretty low in the <br /> design. <br /> Liz Fouhy, (LCP Supervisor), stated that hearing impaired children with hearing aids can be <br /> impacted by noise and equipment. The building needs to be sensitive to this. <br /> PBC Meeting 08.23.17 2 <br />