2017-01-12-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

representatives describing the FAS meeting which is scheduled for January 18 at 9:10 AM at the th MSBA offices. T. Elmore explained that at the FAS meeting, the District describes their Educational Program and the Designer reviews the preferred solution to the MSBA team and their selected Board Members. In the call, unusual issues. 3.Presentation of Construction Delivery Method options & Inspector General CM at Risk Application process (See attached Construction Delivery Slides) The OPM reviewed the slide presentation that had been included with the meeting information packet to the SBC members. The committee held a lengthy discussion on the benefits and concerns with both construction delivery methods, of which most of the topics discussed were captured in the attached presentation slides. After the committee asked specifically about other project experiences using both methods to the OPM and Designer, both the OPM and the Designer recommended the CM at Risk Construction delivery method for many of the control and safety reasons that exist in this process. The Dept. of Public Facilities and Estabrook School Principal both agreed that the CM at Risk benefits were evident from the Estabrook Building experience, especially in terms of a quality building and the safety aspects of the construction process. at Risk delivery method, which could range from 3 to 10%. It was noted that s highly speculative and tend to be more opinion than fact. However, the MSBA is eliminating the additional 2 reimbursement points, and is commenting that there is a premium cost. The team believes that we are still entitled to the additional 2 Reimbursement points if the decision is to use the CM at J. Himmel commented that there are a number of summary benefits related to chapter 149A, CM at Risk construction delivery which should be included into this evenings notes: Improved site safety and management of construction vehicles coming to and from the site. Better control of the schedule ie better on time completion of the project Occupancy of building 4 to 6 months earlier than 149 process (Design, Bid, Build) Earlier use of the site after building construction is done Preconstruction services Subcontractor quality providing better project quality Better fit with redistricting since there is a sense that re-districting is best done at the start of the school year \[there is a greater chance that a September completion is more at risk with the 149 process. D. DiNisco indicated that her read was that the schools that are currently in the pipeline, such as Hastings, are eligible for a CM reimbursement of 2% of eligible costs \[$312 per sf\]. The current construction is thought to be $450 per sf; Lexington would be on the hook for the $138 per square foot delta for the first 2%, or $303,600 if there are 110,000 sf in the project. Furthermore, Lexington would be on the hook for the 149A process premium at a rate of 2