Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of November 6, 1989 4 <br /> voted 3-0 to disapprove the sketch plan for the conventional subdivision and <br /> send the letter, as corrected. <br /> 269. Status of Subdivisions: The Board reviewed an updated schedule of <br /> subdivision activity now before the Board. Mr. Bowyer reported the Hilton <br /> group has submitted for an informal review, the material to be included in the <br /> application for a special permit with site plan review, soon to be filed. It <br /> appears to be in good shape. Comments on the review have been sent by the <br /> staff to their attorney, John Farrington. <br /> The Board agreed to schedule a public hearing on December 4, 1989 for the <br /> definitive plan entitled Opi Road Subdivision if four members can be present, <br /> since action on that subdivision must be taken by December 18, 1989. <br /> Later in the evening, after the arrival of Mr. Williams, it was confirmed that <br /> the public hearing will be held on December 4, 1989. <br /> ************************ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ******************************** <br /> 270. Analysis of Effect of 774 Revised Regulations on Lexington: The Board <br /> reviewed and edited a preliminary draft of an analysis that is proposed to be <br /> sent to the membership of all the Town boards and committees involved directly <br /> or indirectly with affordable housing. <br /> Mr. Sorensen commented that judging from the memo from EOCD a week ago, he <br /> believed that the statute still applies in terms of percentage of housing <br /> units. He questioned whether the local initiative units really provided more <br /> incentive for the production of low and moderate income units. He felt that, <br /> because of the requirement of 10 percent of all housing units, the statute <br /> penalizes towns for supplying more housing, and that it was advantageous for <br /> towns to do as little development as possible in order to meet state goals. <br /> He noted that towns like Lexington have a greater difficulty meeting the goals <br /> than towns that are zoned at much lower densities. <br /> Mr. Bowyer commented that there is still a lot of confusion surrounding the <br /> revisions, and one of the questions still to be resolved is why the same <br /> standards do not apply to local initiative rental projects as do to state- <br /> aided rental projects. He noted more work and clarification has to be made on <br /> what units count under what programs. <br /> ************** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************* <br /> SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br /> 271. PUBLIC HEARING. Pheasant Brook II , Definitive Subdivision Plan: Mrs. <br /> Wood opened the hearing at 9:03 p.m. by reading the legal notice. Approxi- <br /> mately 11 persons were in attendance. <br /> Roger Corbin of The BSC Group - Bedford, Inc. , representing the applicant, <br /> Robert Cataldo, presented the site plan and gave a brief history of events <br /> leading up to this hearing. He reported that all changes recommended by the <br /> Board have been addressed in this plan, and that they have met with the <br /> Conservation Commission and have satisfied their concerns. He pointed out the <br /> existing trail system that has been added to the drawings. He added they have <br /> provided access by easements to this trail system. <br />