Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of November 6, 1989 3 <br /> 30 Bloomfield Street, Janis Hersh & Marc Frader, variance, to allow <br /> Iconstruction of a two-car garage with a side yard setback of 6 feet to <br /> the overhang instead of the required 15 feet. <br /> DETERMINATION OF GRADE AND CONSTRUCTION OF UNACCEPTED STREETS <br /> 267. Valley Road. Lot 18A, Mau 79. Maria Massucco: Michael Sacco, represent- <br /> ing the applicant, reported they had approached the Building Department for a <br /> determination of whether the Lot 18A is a buildable lot. Zoning Officer <br /> Joseph Marino, in a letter dated October 26, 1989, determined the lot was <br /> "grandfathered and buildable". In the letter Mr. Marino also noted that, <br /> prior to the issuance of a building permit, if the property is on an unac- <br /> cepted street, the Planning Board must determine that the street is of ade- <br /> quate grade and construction, as defined in the Board's Policy on Construction <br /> Standards for Unaccepted Streets Relative to Building Lots. <br /> Mr. Bowyer read the pertinent language in the Policy that applies in this <br /> case. It stated "that construction of new dwellings on more than one lot on a <br /> segment of an unaccepted street may require the filing and approval of a <br /> definitive subdivision plan if the following rule applies: if any adjacent or <br /> abutting lot(s) was/were owned by the same person in any of the 10 years <br /> preceding the application, and a building permit was issued for a new dwelling <br /> on that lot, this policy shall not apply and instead, the applicant shall file <br /> a definitive subdivision plan." Mr. Bowyer added that approximately 18 months <br /> ago another lot, which had been in the ownership of the Massucco family, was <br /> determined to be a buildable lot under the provisions of the Policy and it <br /> might appear this additional lot would require a filing for approval of a <br /> subdivision plan. However, he noted if it did apply, there is a requirement <br /> that says a subdivision road must connect to a public street, and the nearest <br /> one is more than 1,000 feet away. According to the Zoning By-Law, no dead end <br /> street can be longer than 650 feet. The Board agreed that they considered the <br /> lots were not abutting or adjacent. <br /> On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Klauminzer, it was voted 3-0 <br /> to determine: 1) that the two lots in question are not "abutting" or "ad- <br /> jacent" because the two lots are on opposite sides of the street, and not even <br /> directly across the street from each other, so that the "ownership by the same <br /> person in any of the 10 years preceding the application" provision in the <br /> Policy does not apply; and 2) that this lot should be treated as any in- <br /> dividual lot is treated on an unaccepted street. <br /> The Board noted that a determination by the Board, and an evaluation by the <br /> Engineering Department of what is necessary to bring the street up to adequate <br /> grade and construction under the policy, must be done. The Board will walk <br /> the road in the next few weeks. <br /> SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br /> 268. Wood Street, Joanne Vilasi, Conventional Sketch Plan: The Board <br /> reviewed and edited a draft letter prepared by Assistant Planner Nordby, <br /> notifying the applicant, Ms. Vilasi, that the Wood Street Development conven- <br /> tional subdivision plan is disapproved because it does not comply with the <br /> Zoning By-Law and the Planning Board's Development Regulations in a number of <br /> areas. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Klauminzer, it was <br />