2016-04-28-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PBC asked if Bond was worried about any of the low bidders especially if their bid seemed low. That discussion is outlined below. • Flooring o PBC asked if the flooring sub perhaps missed any scope since it does not seem to make sense, due to how much lower it is with respect to the estimate. Bond is investigating but believes there was a scope issue in the estimate and that the bid was fair, but will investigate. • Masonry o PBC mentioned the delta between bid and estimate on the masonry bid. o DiNisco stated they had conference calls with Costa to make sure the scope for the project is there. Bond will also follow up. 2. Clarke & Diamond GMP Review - Bond Bond distributed the GMP spreadsheet dated 04/27/16 for review of the costs from the 50% Construction Documents (CD) Budget to 100% CD with sub - contractor pricing on the locker room bids. Locker Room GMP General discussion focused on the abatement work that was not in the original 50% estimate as well as Bonds GC';s and GR "s which are higher than you would normally see on a 3.6 million project but required as it is part of the larger full project requiring more staff and more experienced staff on site. • It was asked if the vote does not pass on the balance of the full project would the staffing costs or GC's and GR's be reduced for just the locker room work. Bond replied that the staff assigned would remain as it was the only way the project scope would get completed with what time is left in the schedule. • DPF stated that $4.1 million has been appropriated, and if the vote passes, we can move forward with signing the GMP's for the summer project. If the vote fails, then we will work with Bond to reduce cost for the GMPs. • DPF stated there is a commitment from Bond to take $50k out, but would not affect the staffing for summer work. Site Enabling GMP General Discussion focused on the reduction in cost from the 50% to the 100% and the level of actual trade bids built into the current pricing versus budget numbers. • Bond informed that due to the timing of the bids, there has been a problem getting steel pricing due to the size of the job and lack of vendors that are available. However they are staying with it to obtain as much pricing as possible for competitive numbers. • PBC asked Bond if they feel comfortable with the documents. Bond replied in the affirmative and stated that that the window of risk is reducing and they have lowered the contingency line item values. • PBC inquired about an allowance for winter conditions and Bond stated winter conditions will be addressed. PBC Meeting 04.28.16 Page 2