Laserfiche WebLink
Tecton Architects on solar canopy update <br /> <br />The Feb 2. HDC meeting was cancelled <br /> <br />Jeff from Tecton presented a power point that will be also presented to the Select Board on Monday 2/13/23 <br /> <br />The Power point slides for the solar canopy included slides showing the use of fletcher field as the Farmers Market as <br />well as the winter skating rink. The views had the main solar canopy in the background. There were also views of <br />both uses of the field with the Mass ave leg solar canopy in the background. These were shown simply to show how the <br />canopies might be used by the fletcher field uses. <br /> <br /> <br />Jeff related that the panel being considered is a Bifacial 585 watt panel. With the current canopy deign, without the <br />mass ave leg, the current calculations show the project about 800 (canopy) sf shy of making net zero, although they <br />are still working to close the gap. <br /> <br />Questions and discussions included: <br />The estimate was discussed at 3.3 million dollars. It is no surprise that the cost of this canopy structure exceeds the <br />cost per square foot of typical solar canopies given it location and the need to be highly sensitive to the very <br />prominent location at the entry to the Town center within the Historic District. It was strongly suggested that the <br />price be parsed something like the following to show the cost of a “vanilla” solar canopy and the added cost/benefit <br />of the refined design to clear the thoughtful recommendations of the Historic Districts Commission, synergistic uses <br />with Fletcher Field functions such as the the Farmers market or music venue and as a large, covered outdoor use <br />when vehicles are not there. , It was suggested that this cost parsing could help sell the project to Boards and Town <br />Meeting. <br /> <br />Can the canopy extend more east toward fletcher or perhaps to the west? There is a Natural Gas regulator valve on the <br />property side of the sidewalk at the fletcher entry and we are trying to keep a safe distance from the underground <br />equipment. Westward expansion is being explored. <br /> <br />It was stated that when having the discussions about costs we should include the benefit received by free or reduced <br />cost energy. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Integrated Design policy <br /> <br />That status of the High School Project was requested. <br />M Cronin replied that the project was still in the Eligibility Period although all Lexington work was complete. We are <br />awaiting an invitation from the MSBA into the Feasibility phase, which would begin with hiring an OPM and Architect. <br />It is projected that if invited we would have our consultants on board by the end of the summer. <br />The RFS for these services could go out within 60 days. <br /> <br />It was asked if the body of the actual Integrated Design Policy (IDP) was being edited or just the attachment. The co- <br />Chair felt that there would have to be at least some update to the main policy document. <br /> <br />Prior to reviewing the highlights of proposed IDP attachment changes the co-chair had prepared a proposed organization <br />chart, which showed where different participants in the process might have their input. There was general discussion <br />about the chart and where some of the various parties might best be placed. It was noted that students and the <br />commercial district did not show up on the chart and should. <br />The School Superintendent shared that this was a good visual and thoughts on placement of different groups. It was <br />thought that this could be shared at School Building Committee once fine-tuned. <br /> <br />Through discussion of the Bridge Document, It was suggested that the Town might want to consider hiring its own