Laserfiche WebLink
addressing agenda items, and will bring issues to a vote when group <br /> --- decisions must be made and announce vote results. <br /> The Chair will maintain a repository of all official work group <br /> documents, but additionaly Karl Kastorf will maintain the group's web <br /> site where they will be posted. <br /> The Chair will maintain a schedule of deadlines for deliverables. <br /> It will be the Chair's task to coordinate subcomittees. <br /> The Chair will see to it that at the start of each meeting one member of <br /> the group, on a rotating basis, is appointed to take minutes. That <br /> person will write up the minutes, in the format distributed in the <br /> Guidance packet, and distribute them to the members by Email, including <br /> a copy to Michael Baker in the Town Manager's office, (instead of by <br /> hardcopy as directed in the Guidance packet) . The minute-taker should <br /> record dissenting opinions, if any, to group discussions. <br /> 3 . Organizational structure and responsibilites were discussed as <br /> outlined in Appendix A of the "Guidance" handout: <br /> Subcomittees will be identified as needed. Each will organize itself <br /> roughly following the larger work group's Workplan, with special <br /> attention to communication links with the work group. <br /> A person to act as liason with the Core Participants Group will be <br /> selected from the work group membership on a shared basis, when needed. <br /> Suzanne Caton or Heather Heartshorn-Sweeney will find out more about the <br /> liason's responsiblities and role. <br /> The membership voted Suzanne Caton to be Chairperson and Marianne <br /> Lazarus Vice Chairperson. <br /> 4. The agenda item of assignment of one or two people to review <br /> existing 20/20 project material which is in Joe Marino's keeping was <br /> bypassed. <br /> 5. An informal discussion of the work group mission statement (from <br /> "Guidance" Appendix B) and its key questions was held, with the <br /> following points: <br /> Is our mission to define the physical character of the town in 20 years <br /> or the means of controlling growth? Answer: the physical character will <br /> be defined by what growth takes place. <br /> What are the factors that make the town nice to live in? Answer: among <br /> others, open space, clean environment, little noise. <br /> Are we deciding what land use and open space there will be? or how do <br /> we/can we control those? <br /> What are the limits? For example, do we want high density all over <br /> town, or the current density all over town, or some dense and some <br /> preserved? <br /> The town's "Values" discussions gave us the town's guidelines--open <br /> space, diversity, etc.--that can provide a framework for our group's <br /> definition of values, which could be our starting point. On the other <br /> hand, resources such as maps can be used to analyze the existing <br /> character. We need to assess the relationship between values and <br />