Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee 13 December 2012 <br />7.0 Estabrook Elementary <br />7.60 Project Update & Discussions of 10/11/12 <br />Project Budget Status <br />March $31,150,670 <br />July $31,150,670 (after 1.3 million in VE) <br />Sept. $33,825,201 (60% CD) <br />These figures represent a $2,674,531 delta to the original budget. <br />110 % Bid Docs expected 11/28/12 <br />Bids Due 12/20/12 <br />CMP expected 12/31/12 <br />VE Table of items, dated 10/11/12 was reviewed. <br />It was discussed that items on the VE list may require determination if they are educational related and therefore the school <br />committee should act or if they are an item of PBC direction. The PBC may vote to adopt VE items from this list and that there may <br />be items that require the School Committee to act upon as soon as they are prepared to do so. <br />Items #1-7 were identified as previously accepted by PBC. <br />Motion by PBC that these items #1-7 of the 10/11/12 VE table be incorporated into the project documents with an expected <br />savings of $652,400. <br />Motion: Phil 2: Peter Vote: 6-0-0 <br />nd <br />Items #8-19 of the VE list were discussed at length with all persons present. There was discussion of an alternate being considered <br />for item#8 the 2 pipe vs. 4 pipe hvac system. <br />Motion by PBC that items #8-19 excluding #15 be approved by the PBC. <br />Motion: Phil 2: Chuck Vote: 6-0-0 <br />nd <br />Items #20-21 no action by PBC <br />Dr. Ash not in favor of item 20 and potentially 21, which were reductions in speech reinforcement technology. <br />Items #22-24 PBC did not want to take <br />Item #25-35 <br />Motion by PBC to accept items #25-35 on the VE table dated 10/11/12. <br />Motion: Chuck 2: Carl Vote: 6-0-0 <br />nd <br />Items 36-45 PBC no Action <br />Items 46-47 PBC to defer <br />Items 48-52 PBC no action <br />General discussion items <br />School Committee meeting on Saturday to review these issues as well. <br />Several PBC members expressed concern for returning project to budget as previously approved by voters. <br />Some discussion from persons present regarding making an additional request of voters for additional funding. Discussion <br />regarding fall special town meeting. School Committee to discuss at their next meeting. <br />PBC members discussed not wanting to participate in a request or presentation at Town meeting for further funding. <br />Collaborative partners and Shawmut discussed rising construction costs as cause for increased pricing, further explaining that there <br />are 12 MSBA school projects scheduled to bid between Jan. and Feb. Of 2013 and that our project if delayed for bidding, came after <br />those projects already bid, then our bid costs could go up even further. <br />Reduction of contingency for budget shortfall was discussed. Collaborative partners stated that the MSBA needs to approve <br />reductions in contingency. <br />If funds are not available then Town cannot sign GMP, If GMP is established on Jan. 1 2013, MSBA regs state town has 120 days to <br />have funding in place. If an interim GMP was established this would need MSBA support. <br />PBC requested information on potential savings to service elevator changes to lift or alternate. Dinisco to evaluate and forward <br />info to facilities. <br />Summary of VE items that PBC was in favor of resulted in a remaining delta to budget of $995,000 if hvac is 2 pipe or $1,250,000 if <br />hvac stays 4 pipe. <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />