Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee 13 December 2012 <br />7.61 Geotechnical work <br />Motion to approve reimbursable expense 13 to DiNisco Design for $11,099 NTE to MGA for Geotechnical engineering consultant. <br />Motion: Chuck 2: Dick Vote: unanimous <br />nd <br />7.62 Supplemental Funding <br />11-8-12 <br />Collaborative partners reviewed a supplemental funding table which has been previously supported by the BOS and School <br />Committee. The table (record copy in PBC file) outlined the $2,593,000 ($2.6 MM) request for supplemental funding for the project <br />Motion to approve supplemental funding request as recommended. <br />Motion: Eric 2: Chuck Vote-5-2-0 <br />nd <br />7.63 Builders Risk <br />11-8-12 <br />Collaborative partners (CP) has a quote in process and anticipate cost under $50,000. Town has a quaote from our insuranve <br />vendor but TMO office feels policy should come from builder not town. <br />Motion to approve expenditure not to exceed $50,000 for Builders Risk Policy <br />Motion: Jon 2: Eric Vote:7-0 <br />nd <br />7.64 Mini GMP#4 for Site work <br />11/8/12 <br />CP presented mini GMP#4 for sitework in the amount of $185,054 <br />Motion to approve Mini GMP#4 for $185,054 for Estabrook School Project. <br />Motion: Jon 2: Eric Vote:7-0 <br />nd <br />7.65 Change Order Approval <br />11/8/12 <br />Discussion on Change order approval process and desire to have approval in place for Facilities similar to Bridge & Bowman Project. <br />PBC communicated that the process already approved (The Director of Facilities is authorized to approve up to $50,000 in change <br />order work between PBC meetings when necessary to benefit schedule of project.) extends to the Estabrook Project. <br />7.66 Change Order Detail <br />11/8/12 <br />PBC raised a question regarding the percentage mark ups to change orders (10% / 5%) and what happens on negative change <br />orders ? CP to discuss at next meeting. <br />7.67 Masonry Mock-up <br />11/8/12 <br />Masonry mock up to be established in field for review. PBC requested related exterior materials samples to be present as well. <br />7.68 Reimbursable <br />11/8/12 <br />DDP Reimbursable table was reviewed and a proposed amendment discussed to reflect a revised reimbursables total of <br />$201,875.00. <br />Motion to approve updated DDP reimbursable to the amount of $208,875.00 Consistent with amendment #3. <br />Motion: Eric 2: Jon Vote: 7-0 <br />nd <br />7.69 Sarnafil and EPDM <br />11/8/12 <br />Discussion regarding the base bid package and alternate option for EPDM roofing (white) and PVC roofing. Some confusion over <br />which materials should be under the base bid and which the alternate. DDP states they were never in a position to change the PVC <br />details on their plans to epdm as they were complete long before election of epdm alternate. <br />The dwgs contain pvc detailing with an alternate to change the material to epdm (white). <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />