2012-09-13-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Lexington Permanent Building Committee 7.0 Estabrook Elementary 13 September 2012 7.16 Mosaic 12/1/11 There has been discussion about saving the Estabrook logo mosaic, so the construction of the mosaic is being tested for contaminants during December break. 3/8/12 No asbestos was found in the wall. Options are to replicate on a mural or move existing to new school. 6/14/12 Whereas an architectural appropriate location or process has not been found yet for the relocated mosaic so at this stage it's relocation is not in the budget, therefore PBC recommends dropping the relocation evaluation process at this time with no funding line in the budget for this work. 7.30 Commissioning Agent award 3/29/12 MSBA assigned Commissioning agent, contact needs to be made and a scope of services received. 4/12/12 Discussion regarding scheduling a meeting with commissioning agent and schedule meeting. 7.40 DiNisco /Walsh Update5 /24/12 DiNisco provided an update of work completed and status on overall project development. Some discussion on the surveyors work and coordinating information to the tree warden who needs to know about trees (6 inch or greater) impacted by the project. Discussion on any allowable use of Henessey Field. Brief recap of materials discussions to date. Much of the discussion focused on reconciliation of the project cost estimates. Several Days has been spent on reconciling quantities and unit prices between the estimates. Final reconciliation not yet available. Some discussions on a number of potential value engineering items were highlighted if needed. 7.41 Collaborative Partners Proiect Update for 5/31/12 5/31/12 Presentation by CP on site logistics, enabling work. Shawmut reviewed site enabling work with options for cost deferments, i.e. retaining wall, fill and storm water near parking lot. CP discussed estimate review and will need Shawmut's numbers for 6/14/12 meeting. There is potentially up to 5 million in budget disparity to the current estimate numbers. TOL position is that we should not be looking to VE 5 million in program, the Design Team needs to identify why current estimates are different from schematic budget. A VE list should be generated but needs to be subject to discussion with User, and others. 7.42 Update for 6/14/12 6/14/12 Value Engineering - $1,396,826 million in yes column after tonight's meeting- school department needs to firm up agreement with these items that affect the education program. Sandy discussed needing the list on 6/8 but never received it. Des. Dev. Package — budget, and VE list due 6/26/12. There will be a LEED checklist in package, we should know if these items affect the VE list. MaryAnn has concerns about the process. Information was requested on 6/8 but was only received information on 6/14 at meeting. School Department needs to be an equal and prepared partner. PBC needs a target date (7/20/12) to be complete with VE list and have good numbers. Discussion on continuation with Shawmut and continued services based upon Budget development. At last meeting Shawmut was to give us a single GMP @ 60% CD. Page 5 of 8