Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee <br />02 August 2012 <br />Des. Dev. Package — budget, and VE list due 6/26/12. There will be a LEED checklist in package, we should know if these items <br />affect the VE list. <br />MaryAnn has concerns about the process. Information was requested on 6/8 but was only received information on 6/14 at <br />meeting. School Department needs to be an equal and prepared partner. <br />PBC needs a target date (7/20/12) to be complete with VE list and have good numbers. <br />Discussion on continuation with Shawmut and continued services based upon Budget development. <br />At last meeting Shawmut was to give us a single GMP @ 60% CD. <br />If we chose to end further discussions with Shawmut we would have to give next CM an opportunity before we go to 149 bid. <br />PBC directed Walsh to discuss with Shawmut the $2 million delta in soft costs below the line. Many are not 100% behind <br />continuing to take out of schools with such a delta. <br />7/12/12 meeting needs to have a decision on Shawmut. <br />7.41 Update for 6/28/12 <br />6/28/12 <br />Joe Riley Handouts and talking points. <br />Update PBC on meeting with Shawmut and goals for 7/12/12 meeting. <br />Discussion on need for Shawmut to focus in on estimate and find areas where costs can be brought to budget. <br />• ** Shawmut needs to report to PBC on 7/12 with roadmap / revised estimate. ** <br />• If we can Design/ Bid/ Build and be on budget so how can Shawmut get us there if we stay 149A? <br />• *DDP wants decision by end of July <br />• *RFW thinks we could wait until as late as Sept. but wouldn't have early foundations. <br />• *If we go 149- RFW thinks we go back to original schedule with completion in June 2014 and little to no float in <br />schedule. <br />• *DPF and architect do not think we should wait on GMP after July 12 <br />Shawmut update on Budget <br />• Currently Shawmut @ $34 million, VE tentatively accepted $1.4 million making Shawmut $32.6 million vs. budget of <br />$31.1 million. <br />• 6/19 — 9/1 Site Enabling <br />• 8/7 - Labor Day Site Work Bid +/- $2 million value <br />• 8/21 -10/1 Concrete and Steele $3 -4 million value <br />• 10/31 +/- Final CD's <br />• 12/7 -12/14 Bid GMP 4 -5 weeks <br />• Xmas get GMP <br />• Demo $300,000, Abatement $900,000 need to solidify scope and get better numbers. <br />• Continue to work @ unit prices <br />• Continue to research market <br />• Expand sub market to get best price <br />• Write scopes of work for all sub prices to define price <br />• Early coordination <br />• End of August getting 60% CD and re- estimate to validate numbers coming in on pricing <br />• By October Design Contingency is 0 <br />• By December Construction Contingency drops from 2.5% to 2% <br />• Shawmut back on 7/12 with formalized plan of above. <br />Summary from tonight. <br />• PBC would like to see a tabulation of how we went from $31.1 million to $35 million. <br />• RFW needs to advise Shawmut of PBC positions <br />• Eric thinks School Committee should support PBC in the Aesthetic issues as they don't involve educational issues. Cost <br />savings on exterior veneer. Jon agrees Aesthetic issues should not be school committee issues. <br />• PBC suggest if Shawmut is not at $31.1 at 7/12 meeting we should not continue any further discussion with them and <br />start talks with CTA. <br />• Ask Kevin Batt (Legal Counsel) for advice, letter from awarding authority <br />• Paul to give Shawmut Fogarty estimate and show them cost model we are striving for. <br />• OPM can approach 2 nd CM and see if they want to negotiate if we are not proceeding with Shawmut. <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />