Laserfiche WebLink
61-188 <br />Selectmen’s Meeting – July 6, 1998 <br />Planning Group; 2) do an analysis of the existing zoning regulations in the 4 towns; 3) based <br />upon applying those existing regulations to the GIS, a buildout, which would allow an analysis <br />of what the full impact would be of development under the existing regulations. The fourth <br />piece of this plan would be to do an analysis of the existing regulations and what their impact is. <br />Once that basis has been established, then the 4-Town Planning Group would consider <br />recommendations to changes in the zoning regulation and collaborative efforts that would allow <br />us to design development in such a way that it protects the qualities that we regard as important <br />in the 4-town area. Mrs. Krieger requests the Board give the 4-Town Planning Group approval <br />to go forward with this proposal. The cost to Lexington for the GIS and analysis of the zoning <br />regulations will be about $5,000; the costs are equally shared over the 4 towns. The analysis of <br />the buildout has a variable span that goes from the low ($750) to the maximum ($7,500). Mrs. <br />Krieger recommends that the Board support the full buildout.This is an opportunity for <br />Lexington to participate with the 4 towns in doing a meaningful planning effort, one that will <br />allow everyone to understand the full impact of development in the 4-town area, particularly <br />when there are significant underdeveloped areas, such as Hanscom Field and Minuteman Tech. <br />The Towns would be prepared to be proactive in development issues rather than reactive. <br />Upon completion of this kind of study, Mr. Busa asked what Lexington can do to development in <br />Concord or vise versa. <br />Mrs. Krieger believes that once you have the full buildout you will have an objective analysis of <br />what the impact of development can be. One in which there is a common playing ground for <br />analysis and one has an understanding of what the buildout in each of the communities can be <br />and analysis of what that impact could be on neighboring communities. Once armed with that, <br />then the real work of the Committee begins to devise procedures and processes by which the 4 <br />towns can collaborate on design and development. <br />Mr. Busa asked if all 4 communities are in on this proposal equally, with equal amounts of <br />interest and commitment? <br />Mrs. Krieger thinks there is commitment among the 4 communities designing development and <br />that there will be collaboration among the 4 communities in terms of understanding the impact of <br />development. <br />Mr. Busa asked what happens after the study is completed. <br />Mrs. Krieger says the next step is to either come back to Town Meeting in the Spring or come <br />back to Town Meeting in some other spring. The intent would be to come to the point where in <br />fact there would be some recommendations with regard to zoning regulations, some <br />recommendations with regard to a collaborative effort among the 4 communities that would <br />design development such that it minimized the impact. Mrs. Krieger’s understanding is money is <br />available for this type of regional collaboration, that it is part of the revenue that is designated <br />from the fuel tax at Hanscom that has been set aside for this type of planning effort. <br /> <br />