Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
2 <br />The question was asked at what point, when we actually get to vo te on either the article <br />or the amended article, can we vote as individuals or do we have to vote the way the <br />committee voted. Ms.Fenollosa assured us we can always vote however we wish. ` <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig asked whether or not Ms. Singh wanted to do anything other than defeat both <br />10(e) and (f). Mr. Pato reported that he had asked her if she was planning to try to <br />substitute a motion and she said she had no plans to change the motion. He reported <br />that Ms. Singh told him that she (and others) just wanted to vote it again and debate it. <br /> <br />Ms. Rhodes reported that the Recreation Committee has reaffirmed its original vote and <br />is not changing it. <br /> <br />Although the likelihood that we will need to caucus is minimal, should there be a need for <br />one, call (978) 990-5249 on a telephone and use access code 3201341. <br /> <br />The discussion was concluded with Mr. Kanter saying he had spoken to Ms. Singh earlier <br />today. She confirmed her action was triggered because Mike Cronin, Director of Public <br />Facilities, had said that the area being considered for a possible high school location was <br />all 54 acres. Mr. Kanter pointed out to her that comment was nothing more than an <br />enumeration of all possibilities, but that he thought it was absolutely irrelevant to <br />reconsideration because the whole area has been openly discussed for a long time. <br /> <br />3. Committee Business: Since approval of the CPC minutes of April 11 th was not on the <br />agenda, action on them will be carried over to our next meeting. <br /> <br />4. Motion: To adjourn (moved and seconded by Jeanne Krieger and Melinda Walker, <br />respectively) <br /> <br />Approved unanimously by roll call vote at 5:18 pm: 8-0 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />D. Horton, recorder <br /> <br />Approved 6/7/22 <br />