|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2022-04-13-CPC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Community Preservation Committee-CPC
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022-04-13-CPC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2023 6:09:23 PM
Creation date
6/17/2022 8:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2022
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CPC - Community Preservation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE <br />APRIL 13, 2022 <br />REMOTE ZOOM MEETING <br />MEETING ID: 830 5363 9755 <br /> <br />Committee Members Present by Roll Call: Marilyn Fenollosa (Chair), Charles Hornig (Vice- <br />Chair), David Horton, Jeanne Krieger, Joe Pato, Robert Pressman, Lisah Rhodes, and Melinda <br />Walker (arrived at 5:07 pm) <br /> <br />Committee Member(s) Absent: None <br /> <br />Other Attendees: David Kanter (Capital Expenditures Committee liaison) <br /> <br />1. Call to order: Ms. Fenollosa called the meeting to order at 5:04 pm, followed by r eading <br />the guidelines for a public meeting and for a meeting via Zoom. <br /> <br />2. Vote to Reconsider Article 10(e) (Center Playground Bathrooms and Maintenance <br />Building Renovation) and (f) (Playground Improvements – Hard Court Surfaces): <br /> <br />A vote by the CPC to reconsider Article 10(e) and (f) was not put forth and voted on, after <br />a ruling Town Counsel Mina Makarious made at a meeting today attended by Town <br />Meeting Moderator Deborah Brown, CPC Chair Fenollosa, and Mr. Makarious. Ms. <br />Fenollosa provided a summary of the procedures he outlined. Her summary had Mr. <br />Makarious’s approval: <br /> <br />• If there is a motion by Town Meeting to reconsider, the CPC will remain silent on <br />the matter. <br />• If reconsideration passes and the article is reopened: <br />- If asked, we will reaffirm our original recommendation to Town Meeting that <br />the projects be approved as stated in our Report and the original moti on. <br />- If any Town Meeting member tries to amend the article, the Moderator will <br />only permit a reduction in amount, not scope, as per CPA requirement s. If <br />someone does recommend such a reduction, we will ask for the approval of <br />the Recreation Committee, i.e., the applicant of the project, to see if they wish <br />this to happen. <br />- If the Recreation Committee tells us no, i.e., they do not wish to reduce the <br />amount, we will do nothing, since we have nothing new to approve. <br />- If the Recreation Committee tell us yes, giving us a new application, we will <br />request a recess to enable us (the CPC) to caucus and vote on the new <br />application. We will then report back to Town Meeting on our position <br />regarding the revised application/amount. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.