Laserfiche WebLink
14. Timeline <br />The housing project as described should be able to be undertaken in 1 -2 years. <br />5.3 Evaluation of the Lexington Recreation Committee Proposal <br />Introduction <br />The Lexington Recreation Committee (LRC) presented three iterations of a plan to include an athletic <br />field, trails, tot lot, affordable housing and community gardens, along with required parking and vehicle <br />access. See the "Summary of the Proposals" (Section 4 of this report) for a detailed chronological <br />description of the LRC proposal and modifications to it. <br />During the past few months, there was much discussion and clarification of the figures for field use <br />toward establishing a need for an additional field; but the bottom line is that the BLUPC accepts the LRC <br />contention that additional facilities are needed, and that if built, a new facility would primarily serve <br />Lexington school children. <br />The community gardens, trails, park, and affordable housing elements of the proposal are also worthy <br />additions to Lexington and the BLUPC very much appreciates the efforts of the LRC to address the other <br />needs of the Town. However, the discussion here in the Summary will focus on the major goal of the <br />LRC (per the January 31, 2011 email), the addition of a 300' x 195' multipurpose field to the Town's <br />inventory of playing fields. <br />Again, the most recent proposal illustrates the 300' x 195' multipurpose field along the north end of the <br />parcel with an east -west orientation (see Figure 5.3.1). Along the east side of the multipurpose field, <br />along the Borensztein property, the proposal shows a 40' buffer /safety zone, which is the standard for <br />athletic fields. Along the north side, a 38' buffer is illustrated, which should be adequate not only as a <br />runoff and spectator seating zone, but also to protect any trees on the abutters' property and the <br />existing stone wall that runs along the property line. However, on the west side, a 14' buffer /safety zone <br />between the southwest corner of the field and the Goldinger property is shown. The January 31, 2011, <br />email states: "A 40 -foot buffer would not be necessary on the left side of the field since there is no <br />home located in close proximity to the abutting property line because a residence is not currently <br />located there." The Committee respectfully questions this assumption. As the property is privately <br />owned, the parcel may be developed and /or the owner may not want Town activity on their property. If <br />a fence is required, the 14' -foot buffer /safety zone may be inadequate for safe and convenient play <br />(runoff, goal attempts, ball retrieval, etc.). <br />More importantly, when the field above, as described in the January 31, 2011, email, is laid out on the <br />survey (see below), the overall dimensions do not fit on the Busa property. The distance between the <br />Borensztein property line and the easternmost extent of the Goldinger property measures about 343', <br />not the required 354' (300' field + 40' east buffer + 14' west buffer). With the 40' buffer /safety zone <br />positioned along the east property line ( Borensztein property) there is about 3' between the field goal <br />line and the Goldinger property line, not the 14' dimensioned on the Recreation Department revised <br />plan. (At the northwest corner of the field, the property line angles to the west, so there is actually a <br />larger buffer as the property line moves to the southwest.) <br />Busa Land Use Proposal Committee Report <br />Page 32 / 52 <br />