2012-02-22-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PBC Meeting Minutes 2 -22 -12 4.0 Bridge &Bowman Renovation Projects 4.12 Project schedule For the purposes of reducing ongoing printed text, previous entries under this heading may have been removed from current meeting minutes. Please refer to previous editions of the minutes for older insertions. 10/13/11 Construction Documents are scheduled for completion on 11/3/11. Lexington will need up to date copies for MEP document review. Contractor prequalification deadlines need to be scheduled into project. 11/2/11 Final Documents due 1113 Drawings to go to MEP review Variance request to be sent to Plumbing Board for unisex toilet in kitchen Pre - Qualification of Contractors due 11122 12/8/11 The Plumbing Board Variances were mailed out. Contractor pre - qualification was discussed at a mtg. on 1217111 and a list of pre - qualified firms has been established. Plans and specs are released to bid on 113112. 1/19/12 Filed Sub bids are due 1/31/12 Addenda issued by DDP 1/19/12 GC Bids 2/14/12 4.26 Roof Top Unit screening 11/2/11 It was reported that the roof top hvac equipment would be larger than originally anticipated and could be 18 inches to 2 feet taller. There was some concern expressed over the aesthetics of the larger units and the overall view of the school to the public, notwithstanding any sound abatement concerns. Various options for screening and placement of support structure for future screening were discussed. Currently six units suspected of a need for screening based on sound abatement were modified to include roof reinforcing for future screen panels. It was discussed to increase this count to 10 to include units where screens maybe desired for aesthetics as well; however this motion was not acted upon, leaving just the original 6 locations 12/8/11 This issue was again discussed and the PBC elected to request a unit price be added to the bid submission for adding the steel support to other RTU locations if the town elected to do so during construction. 1/19/12 Initial feedback from architect was that they did not want to include a unit price for additional RTU locations, but they later agreed to do so. 4.28 MEP Review 12/1/11 Brief discussions over C3 review of MEP documents comments have been sent to Architects and Engineers and engineers have responded. C3 satisfied with return comments. 12/8/11 PBC Requested that DPF ask C3 to verify if suggested changes have been made. 1/19/12 DPF did request C3 to verify changes made, which was done and C3 and DPF are following up on last items. Page 3 of 9