Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />1 -26 -12 <br />Motion: To accept and support DiNisco Design Partnership letter of 26 January 2012 recommending approval of <br />schematic design submittal package inclusive of space summary template and Schematic Design floor plans for the <br />Estabrook School project with an estimated construction cost not to exceed $31,200,000 and estimated project cost <br />not to exceed $40.8 million, with school occupancy in September 2014; subject to compliance with Lexington Zoning <br />Code and applicable laws. <br />Motion: Dick Perry 2nd: Jon Himmel Vote: 6 -0 <br />Affirmative: 6 Jon Himmel, Carl Oldenburg, Chuck Favazzo, Joe McWeeney, Dick Perry, Eric Brown <br />Negative: 0 <br />Abstained: 0 <br />Not Present: 2 Peter Johnson, Philip Coleman <br />7.15 LEED <br />12/1/11 <br />Brief discussion on LEED design. DDP expressed that MSBA reimburses 2% for LEED Silver certification the first pass thru the LEED <br />scorecard should occur in the schematic design phase. <br />1/5/12 <br />Draft of LEED scorecard will be at next meeting <br />1/19/12 <br />Draft of LEED scorecard, tentatively showing 34 points presumed yes, 33, presumed maybe and 39 presumed no. Although this <br />will continue to be developed thru design it is presumed that LEED Silver is achievable. <br />LEED Scorecard will be reviewed with Facilities after 2/2/12. <br />7.16 Mosaic <br />12/1/11 <br />There has been discussion about saving the Estabrook logo mosaic, so the construction of the mosaic is being tested for <br />contaminants during December break. <br />7.17 Traffic Clarification <br />12/8/11 <br />PBC discussed the need for clarification as to the extent of involvement of the ETF committee with traffic concerns on the Estabrook <br />site. Peter Johnson will communicate a reminder to the ETF that the PBC has responsibility for oversight of traffic concerns within <br />the Estabrook site and that while they will seek a recommendation from the ETF on the amount of queuing that may be required <br />based upon their work leading to the property line, it is the PBC who should coordinate the actual design and layout of this work on <br />site with the architect and traffic consultant. <br />1/5/12 <br />ETF has not met since the 12/8/11 PBC discussion above. <br />7.19 Contract bride <br />12/8/11 <br />DPF advised that a strategy will need to be developed to use remaining available funds from current authorization to bridge gap of <br />professional services at the conclusion of the study phase of the project to allow continued development of the project or <br />subsequent phases until town meeting authorizes additional funding. <br />1/5/12 <br />Proposals needed in advance of next meeting <br />1/19/12 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />