Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />09 June 2011 Meeting <br />1.2 Monthly Bills <br />1 -13 -11 <br />DPF presented invoices totaling $1,150.00, which were approved for payment <br />4 -14 -11 <br />DPF presented invoices totaling $10,843.00, which were approved for payment <br />6/9/11 <br />DPF presented invoices totaling $127,500.00, which were approved for payment <br />1.3 Meeting Minute Format (Item Relocated from 2.24 to general business) <br />For the purposes of reducing ongoing printed text previous entries under this heading may have been removed from current meeting <br />minutes. Please refer to previous editions of the minutes for older insertions. <br />Mark Barrett is waiting for proposal from PSS. <br />7/13/10 <br />Software has been purchased, is currently being installed on town server and DPF to coordinate with install on local computer and <br />training. <br />9/14/10 <br />DPF advises that the company we purchased the software from has ceased their relationship with the software manufacturer and a <br />new vendor has contacted the town about providing support/ training. PBC supports getting training from the new support group <br />as long as town is getting what it originally contracted for at the some costs. Mark Barrett will follow up. <br />4/14/11 <br />DPF updated PBC on setting up training with new vendor, PBC is interested in getting the training completed so that the new <br />software can be used as new school projects start. <br />5/12/11 <br />DPF reported a quote received for training on prolog, but could only find out of state vendors approved by the software company. <br />PBC member suggested he knew of a local firm we could get training from that would be more cost effective. <br />1.4 PBC Make -up and Projects <br />7/13/10 <br />There was brief discussion about the make -up of the committee, numbers of members etc, and the issues of working with the <br />growing volume of projects in Town. No conclusions made. <br />9/14/10 <br />Additional discussion on the issue focused on clarifying areas or the specifics of where the PBC felt changes to the PBC <br />organization /structure could be beneficial. <br />a. Recommend to increase PBC member core /permanent number from 5 to 9 permanent members. <br />b. Have a permanent member joined by a client (temporary /project) member(s) to make a sub committee. PBC to <br />approve client members. <br />C. Client members should be required to come to monthly PBC meetings to report on progress. <br />d. Clearly define what projects constitute PBC involvement. Le, studies, programming, design, construction? <br />e. What is the process for becoming a PBC member is there an application? <br />f. What are the details of how Subcommittee process will work, what are their authorities, can they make approvals <br />and determinations or is Full PBC approval required at the monthly meeting. <br />g. Will project meetings that have sub committee members present require posting? <br />10/12/10 <br />Discussion on this issue took place during executive session portion of meeting. <br />12/14/10 <br />Proposed Language for a Town Meeting article relative to the PBC Committee format was discussed with a few edits proposed. First <br />Paragraph, "five to Nine" members and change "more than two" to "more than three" <br />1/13/11 <br />Town Meeting article was sent to Carl Valente and to Town Counsel, no response to date. <br />2/10/11 <br />Discussions around the needs to properly vet building or user programs, Selectmen involvement in study process and selectmen <br />liaisons to study committees. <br />Discussed PBC bylaw restructure. Pat Goddard to discuss by law language with Carl. Jon Himmel will compose a process for PBC <br />Committee, mail to PBC members for input and agreement of process. <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />