2011-04-14-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PBC Meeting Minutes 10 February 2011 Meeting PBC discussed HKT pursuing painter to get them to do as much as possible, but do it right. Motion to set aside monies to hire a specialist to review conditions and processes of the wash bay area, may include forensics. Motion: Dick Perry 2nd: Eric Brown Vote: 5 -0 6/08/10 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Proposal was reviewed by PBC. PBC members would like the scope and tasks for investigation needs to be defined. Mark Barrett to coordinate a meeting to discuss with Greg from SG &H. 7/13/10 Meeting was held on 6118110 to review SGH Scope on report for vehicle wash Bay. Draft report due on 7/26/10 for PBC review and proposed review mtg on 7128110 with Town Manager. 9/14/10 When estimate is received DPF will send out to PBC members to review. 10/12/10 It was discussed that in future contracts System Design Statements along with training requirements need to include design intent. 2.83 Front Walkway 9/14/10 DPF reported that DPW had a cost range of $13- 15,000 to install a sidewalk following the incoming driveway, instead of passing by the flagpole at the center. PBC felt that the work could be done for less money and should be bid instead of using the state vendor contract and that HKT had a responsibility to provide the town with design options and construction documents that could be put out to bid. PBC asked DPF to notify HKT on need to meet design /code requirements and that they should provide layouts /options (bike path is not a viable design option) to the PBC for review and that construction documents suitable for bid should be provided 10/12/10 Mark Barrett will contact Gary Rhodes for a memo on code violation. 11/9/10 Memo was sent to HKT and awaiting response. 12/14/10 HKT provided several sketches that would satisfy the requirement to connection the public sidewalk to the front entrance. The PBC elected to have Bill Hadley select a walkway plan from those presented, that he was satisfied with and get pricing to complete the work. 4/14/11 Reported no activity to date, waiting for snow to melt, DPW will be obtaining prices for work defined by HKT and will report back to PBC. 4.0 Bridge &Bowman Renovation Projects 4.4 LEED Certification 12/14/10 The Project Architects outlined that LEED certification was not considered to be viable given the scope and nature of the proposed work at Bridge and Bowman and recommended against pursuing the certification. The School Principals' thought that the funding for LEED pursuits could be better suited to go towards items that will effect programming or educational issues. 4/14/11 LEED was discussed and it was agreed that work should focus on energy aspects and incorporate into the specs those items that can be incorporated in the spirit of LEED. Further that the last part of the last sentence of the LEED Ltr from DPC dated 23 November 2010, should be followed.... "... we suggest designing all systems within the current scope to a standard that would be required for LEED Certification but not add additional scope solely for the purposes of achieving certification." And report back on what measures are being done. Page 4 of 6