Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />13 January 2011 Meeting <br />2.86 Mechanics garage A/C <br />1/13/11 <br />DPF requested that the PBC consider funding an approximate $8,500 engineering study and evaluation report on <br />the provision of air - conditioning to the mechanics garage bays and sign shop at 201 Bedford street. <br />The PBC denied action on the request to support the evaluation study. The PBC citied that it was not part of the <br />original building scope and that they as a body had previously agreed that no further requests should be considered <br />for the use of un- committed funds from the project, see item 2.2 above. <br />3.0 Cary Memorial Hall - Venue Improvement Study <br />3.2 Progress <br />11 -9 -10 <br />It was reported that the project was initiating and that public Meetings were being scheduled to gather data on the <br />use of the building. <br />4.0 Bridge &Bowman Renovation Projects <br />4.4 Update from School Committee Meeting <br />12/14/10 <br />The committee was given an overview of the presentation that was shown to the School Committee in support of <br />additional scope items. <br />The School Committee recommended pursuing additional funding to incorporate the additional scope items. <br />4.4 LEED Certification <br />12/14/10 <br />The Project Architects outlined that LEED certification was not considered to be viable given the scope and nature <br />of the proposed work at Bridge and Bowman and recommended against pursuing the certification. The School <br />Principals' thought that the funding for LEED pursuits could be better suited to go towards items that will effect <br />programming or educational issues. <br />4.5 Project Direction <br />12/14/10 <br />With the School Committees support of pursuing increased funding to expand the base scope of the project <br />discussion ensued on the paths of the project and if and how work could continue until the spring town meeting. <br />The DPC suggested a fee increase would be warranted in the area of $280,000 to accommodate the increased <br />scope. Multiple scenarios were discussed concerning what scope items could continue, scheduling paths and what <br />work could be continued contractually. <br />Motion to recommend that project go dormant until additional funding is authorized for expanded scope or <br />direction to continue with original scope received. <br />Motion: Dick Perry 2 Carl Oldenburg Vote: 6 -0 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />