Laserfiche WebLink
. 2- <br />The basic tenet of the plan developed is that concentration of '_' <br />development is economically and environmentally more practical than the <br />current mode of scattered development and would encourage transit, ridesharing <br />and pedestrian traffic thereby reducing auto travel, traffic congestion, air <br />pollution and fuel consumption. This concept would also reduce the pressure <br />to develop open land and environmentally sensitive lands. <br />Mr. Pillsbury showed a series of slides illustrating the MAPC sub- <br />regions; overall trends in population and employment; the growing <br />affordability gap in housing; traffic growth; and level of service on major <br />roads. Also displayed were charts showing annual water and sewer expenditures <br />for the last 20 and the next 20 years, and the percentages of infrastructure <br />expenditures from 1970 to 2,010 by federal, state and local governments. <br />Myla Kabat -Zinn, Lexington's MAPC representative, requested comments <br />from Selectmen and Planning Board members to aid her in voting at the annual <br />meeting. <br />Mrs. Smith thanked Mr. Pillsbury and Mss Herrigel for their <br />presentation, noting that good progress has been made using the technical <br />skills of MAPC and input from communities. She urged those wishing to make <br />comments on the plan to get in touch with Mrs. Kabat -Zinn as soon as possible. <br />CATV COMMITTEE 1989 COMPLIANCE REVIEW <br />Mr. McSweeney, Selectman Liaison to the Cable Television & Communlcati(Tr <br />Advisory Committee, commended that Committee for its hard work and thanked <br />them for their dedication on behalf of the Town. He turned the discussion <br />over to Frank DiGiammarino, Chairman of the Cable Committee for a report c <br />'s activities and review of its 1989 Cable TV Compliance Revie NEW <br />Committ e e <br />Dr. DiGiammarino referred to the Selectmen's Charge which requires th &_ <br />the Committee must monitor the Cable company's compliance with its contract <br />with the Town. A process for fulfilling this requirement is now in place and <br />consists of an annual performance review in two parts: completion by the <br />vendor of a written questionnaire and an annual Public Hearing and Forum. <br />Information on the company's performance received this year had been <br />evaluated and presented in the Committee's report. <br />It had been determined that the following items require attention: <br />• Customer dissatisfaction with service, signal quality and office <br />practice} <br />• Cablevision's and the Committee's disagreement about which documents <br />define the License, which provisions are in force and how these <br />provisions are interpreted; <br />• Cablevision's policies regarding maintenance and replacement of <br />access, system and institutional Trunk equipment. <br />Based on the Committee's analysis of the 1989 Cable Compliance Review, <br />the Committee had recommended that the Selectmen issue a ''ormal notice of <br />default in accordance with Section 33(g) of the License, "for repeated <br />violations of obligations contained within the License tt a In addition, the <br />Committee recommended that representatives of the Selectmen and the Cable <br />Television and Communications Advisory Committee be appointed and authorized <br />to negotiate a satisfactory resolution of issues contained in the compliance <br />review with officials from Cablevision, Inc. <br />