Laserfiche WebLink
1775R"otic TOWN OF LEXINGTON <br /> Q <br /> m Permanent Building Committee <br /> i Q Permanent Members <br /> APRIL19TM Co-Chairman: Jon Himmel & Co-Chairman Dick Perry <br /> FxIN61-� Philip Coleman, Charles Favazzo, Carl Oldenburg, Peter Johnson, Howard Hobbs <br /> Project Specific Members <br /> Clarke&Diamond Schools Hastings Elementary Fire Station Visitors Center LCP LCC <br /> Margaret Coppe Curt Barrentine Robert Cunha Joel Berman Teresa Hank <br /> Edwin Goodell Andrew Clarke Joseph Sirkovich Peter Kelly Wilson Manz <br /> January 10, 2019 <br /> Members Present: Jon Himmel, Dick Perry, Philip Coleman, Charles Favazzo, Carl Oldenburg, Curt <br /> Barrentine, Joe Sirkovich <br /> DPF Staff: Mike Cronin/Director of Public Facilities, Ann Marie Ponzini <br /> Board of Selectman Representative (BOS): Jill Hai, Doug Lucente <br /> School Committee (SC): Kate Colburn, Deepika Sawhney Capital Expenditures (CEC): David Kanter <br /> 6:10 PM- The meeting was called to order— 201 Bedford Street, Room 221 <br /> 1. Discussion on High Performance Sustainable Building Policy— Jon Himmel(PBC) <br /> This meeting was to continue ongoing discussions related to having a single Sustainable Design <br /> Policy for the Town that should be adopted by both the Board of Selectman (BOS) and School <br /> Committee (SC); thus ensuring consistency with the Town of Lexington's Project Designs. <br /> The discussion focused on how to best achieve Sustainable Goals in a more balanced manner. In <br /> order to achieve the Policy Goals, it was suggested that the early stages would require involvement <br /> of the key engineering disciplines that are already part of the Architect/Engineer Team. It was noted <br /> that the industry standard is to provide extremely little engineering input during the early phases. <br /> THE DISCUSSION HIT A LOT OF TOPICS: <br /> Capital Expenditure Concerns: David Kanter (CEC) discussed feasibility studies and how sometimes <br /> the client needs to be interceded with to keep the "required" scope in check. With the growth in <br /> Lexington's expectations the question is how best to better capture the evolution of LEED and <br /> Town's Sustainable expectations. David K stated the town does not have unlimited resources. Cost, <br /> Sustainability, Life Cycles, and Schedule include the reality of funding. Project expectations have to <br /> be part of the initial scope; inclusive of sustainability, cost and schedule decisions. David K stated <br /> discipline is needed, and asked what mechanism will be installed to instill discipline? <br /> Process: Jon H suggested having work sessions with brainstorming very early on with the Design <br /> Team, the Client organization, DPF, PBC and Sustainable Lexington, <br /> • The early phase work sessions would as envisioned include the key engineering disciplines. <br /> • The Policy and its attachments should be included with the Request for Proposal (RFP). <br /> A LEED worksheet that includes unique Lexington requirements should be used as a phase by <br /> phase scoresheet for the project. The estimate cost of the project and the schedule should be <br /> reviewed phase by phase, and compared with approved project expectations. <br /> 201 BEDFORD STREET• LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02420 <br />