Laserfiche WebLink
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2019-1 STM <br /> This request is for $1.5 million for the services of transportation engineers and a public-engagement <br /> specialist to develop that Report for the Hartwell Avenue/Bedford Street area. It will be based on a review <br /> of present and future conditions, including current and projected traffic volumes, traffic management, <br /> safety requirements, signal warrants, and a general operational analysis. Proposed preliminary designs are <br /> expected to include dimensions and cross-sections, horizontal and vertical alignments, and identified <br /> easements and/or land takings. It will explore alternatives for multimodal transportation in the area. The <br /> Report will review previous plans and proposals and examine the feasibility of roundabouts and/or <br /> improved traffic signals and slip lanes at the Bedford/Route 128 and Bedford/Hartwell junctions. The <br /> Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has indicated support for investigating these <br /> concepts. <br /> Hartwell Avenue is Lexington's largest commercial zone, serving as a town and regional hub in an area of <br /> 20,000 employees. Its buildings are generally outdated and limited by dimensional and density <br /> restrictions imposed in past years. It presents the best opportunity to grow the Town's commercial tax <br /> base by increasing the density of its development. The Planning Board and staff have been working on an <br /> updated zoning plan for Hartwell for several years and anticipate bringing it to Town Meeting in the <br /> future. However, Town residents, particularly those in the immediate area whose lives are most affected <br /> by the growing congestion, have indicated that any support for such a rezoning initiative would be <br /> contingent on a genuine effort to address the existing and projected traffic problems. Preparation of the <br /> Report would include continuing public input, including formal hearings, before MassDOT considers <br /> approval of a design. <br /> If the 25% Design is approved, the Town will seek additional funding approval from Town Meeting to <br /> bring the design to the 100% level and to prepare applications for Federal monies (to be allocated by the <br /> State) for construction. Because Bedford Street(Route 4/225) is a State road, funding of up to$48 million <br /> may be available. Lexington has already invested almost $9 million in anticipation of this project, <br /> including $7 million for the Hartwell Avenue/Maguire Road intersection and bridge replacement; <br /> $1 million for the ongoing replacement of Hartwell Avenue water mains; and $1 million for safety <br /> improvements to the Bedford Street/Eldred Street pedestrian crossing, a bus shelter, a mixed-use path and <br /> landscaping. <br /> The majority of this Committee supports this funding request as a necessary step to address a significant <br /> problem that has been in discussion for decades. Funding design work to the 25% level is necessary to <br /> understand what level of traffic-congestion mitigation might be achieved and to remain in the queue for <br /> State and Federal funding, hopefully advancing a future project to 2024-2029. However, even if <br /> Lexington were not to receive outside funding going forward, the need to address the traffic problem <br /> remains. The results of this study should be important input to the discussion of potential zoning changes <br /> on Hartwell Avenue, and thus are needed as soon as possible. In short, this study is important to <br /> undertake now to address a problem of long standing, hopefully to advance the timeline for a <br /> construction project to the near future, and to provide critical information to help guide zoning change <br /> discussions <br /> The minority of this Committee is opposed to funding at this time the 25% Design Report. It is deemed <br /> premature because (without priority order): <br /> (1) Nothing has been identified to indicate whether any of the potential changes to be addressed <br /> by the 25% Design Report have been shown in prior applications meaningfully to mitigate an <br /> already severe traffic situation as is Lexington's instant case—especially considered that it is <br /> agreed that even with the current zoning of that area the traffic volume will increase over time. <br /> $1.5 million is far too much to appropriate—even ifjustified(which hasn't been shown)—without <br /> having a reasonable expectation that the current traffic could be mitigated. Just rearranging the <br /> traffic pattern might only reposition the "parking-lot"situation. <br /> (2) It appears that little can be done to materially enhance the safety of the area without further <br /> aggravating the severe traffic problem. <br /> (3) The proposed Project will be addressing future, unspecified, conditions; however, the current, <br /> underway, "Hartwell District Zoning Initiative" proposes a wide range of re-zoning-related, <br /> 3 <br />