HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-11-12-CEC-STM1-rpt CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE 2019-1 STM
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE
TOWN OF LEXINGTON
REPORT TO THE
2019-1 SPECIAL TOWN MEETING (STM
NOVEMBER 12, 2019
Released November 5, 2019
Submitted by:
Charles Lamb, Chair
David G. Kanter, Vice-Chair & Clerk
Sandy Beebee
Rodney Cole
Wendy Manz
Frank Smith
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2019-1 STM
2019-1 STM Warrant-Article Explanations and
Recommendations
Cites of the "Town Warrant"refer to the 7 Oct 2019 "Town of Lexington Warrant for the
Special Town Meeting 2019-1", November 12, 2019.
Article 3:Appropriate To and Funding Committee
From Specified Funds Requested Source Recommends
Stabilization Funds (SFs)
(Only those actions related to (b)Traffic Mitigation SF
Capital) Payment from
Deposit$280,000 King Street Approval(6-0)
Properties
(g) Transportation Management Overlay District SF
Information Only.Action will take place under Article 8.
Withdraw$250,000 SF N/A
(h) Capital SF
Deposit$732,697 Increase to FY2020 Approval(6-0)
Revenue
"To see if the Town will vote to appropriate sums of money to and from Stabilization Funds in
accordance with Section 5B of Chapter 40 of the Massachusetts General Laws for the purposes of: (a)
Section 135 Zoning By-Law, (b) Traffic Mitigation, (c) Transportation Demand Management/Public
Transportation, (d) Special Education, (e) Center Improvement District, (f) Debt Service, (g)
Transportation Management Overlay District, (h) Capital, (i) Payment in Lieu of Parking, (j) Visitor
Center Capital Stabilization Fund, (k) Affordable Housing Capital Stabilization Fund, (1) Water System
Capital Stabilization Fund, and (m)Ambulance Stabilization Fund; determine whether such sums shall be
provided by the tax levy, by transfer from available funds, from fees, charges or gifts or by any
combination of these methods; or act in any other manner in relation thereto.
"DESCRIPTION: This Article proposes to fund Stabilization Funds for specific purposes and to
appropriate funds there from. Money in those funds may be invested and the interest may then
become a part of the particular fund. These funds may later be appropriated for the specific
designated purpose, by a two-thirds vote of an Annual or Special Town Meeting, for any lawful
purpose."
(Town Warrant)
For all Stabilization Funds (SFs), deposits (additions) are approved by a simple majority vote of Town
Meeting.
General Information Regarding the Traffic Mitigation SF: Additions are generally payments by
developers as a condition of a Special Permit; withdrawals are for the purpose of financing
traffic—mitigation projects.
General Information Regarding the Transportation Management Overlay District SF: Additions are
generally payments by developers as a condition of a project in that District; withdrawals are for the
purpose of financing transporation infrastructure improvements.
General Information Regarding the CSF: Available cash would be added to the CSF with the intent that,
as has been done in the past, the CSF will have continuing withdrawals to mitigate the tax burden of
major capital projects. The withdrawals are expected to be amounts cited for appropriation under the
Operating Budget toward debt service; to be an additional source, to the extent funds remain in the CSF,
1
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2019-1 STM
toward each year's projected debt service for projects excluded from the Proposition 21/2 property-tax-levy
limit, as approved by the voters; and, to a much lesser degree, for debt not excluded from that limit (i.e.,
funded within the tax-levy limit).
Article 8:Appropriate Funding For Funds Funding Committee
25% Design Of The Route Requested Source Recommends
4/225 Bedford Street-Hartwell $1,250,000 GF (Debt)
Avenue-Wood Street (multiple Bond
Transportation Improvement Anticipation Notes)+
Project $1,500,000 $250,000 Transportation Approval(5-1)
Management Overlay
District SF (both sources
require a 2/3rd vote)
"To see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money for the Route 4/225 Bedford Street, Hartwell
Avenue, and Wood Street Transportation Improvement Project; and authorize the Selectmen to take by
eminent domain, purchase or otherwise acquire any fee, easement or other interests in land necessary
therefor; determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy,by transfer from available funds,
including enterprise funds, by borrowing, or by any combination of these methods; determine if the Town
will authorize the Selectmen to apply for, accept, expend and borrow in anticipation of state aid for such
capital improvements; or act in any other manner in relation thereto.
DESCRIPTION: This Article will appropriate funding to develop 25% design for a major
transportation improvement project which includes minor improvements on Wood Street, four
travel lanes in most of the project corridor with three travel lanes in southern portion of Hartwell
Avenue, a sidewalk or multi-modal path and bike lanes on both sides of the roadways; raised
center medians; safe pedestrian accommodations and crossings; and reconstruction of major
intersections: Bedford Street and Hartwell Avenue intersection as well the intersection of the on
and off ramps to I-95. A future request for the Town to fund through 100% design and Plans,
Specifications, and Estimates would follow at a later Town Meeting. This critical funding of 25%
design plans will enable the Town to stay on the state's Long Range Transportation Plan to
eventually obtain external resources to fund construction costs to bring the project through
completion of the on and off ramps to I-95."
(Town Warrant)
For more than 30 years, the intersection of Hartwell Avenue and Bedford Street, extending along the
Bedford Street (State Route 4/225) corridor to the Route 128 ramps and along the length of Hartwell
Avenue to Hanscom Air Force Base and Wood Street, has been identified by the Town as a problem
traffic area. Increasing traffic between Bedford and Lexington, as well as more drivers accessing the Air
Force Base and the Lincoln Laboratory facility on Wood Street, have contributed to ever greater
congestion with unsafe conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. Previous efforts to ameliorate the problem,
most recently with a 2011 study of alternative configurations of the Route 128/Route 4/225 connection
and the Bedford Street and Hartwell Avenue intersection, did not progress, in part because of no
consensus between the State and the Town of Lexington on feasible improvements.
Lexington has held a place on the State Long Range Transportation Plan, administered by the Boston
Region Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO), for State aid in the 2030-2034 time band. Given the
increasing urgency of the situation, our Town Manager and Planning Department, with the support of
State Representative Michelle Ciccolo, have requested the MPO to move Lexington up to the 2024-2029
time band. However, the Town is required to fund a Functional Design Report ("Report") to the 25%
design level to be eligible for aid and will risk being dropped from the Long Range Transportation Plan
and therefore be ineligible for inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in 2024 if this
work has not been undertaken. Completion of the Report improves Lexington's chances of receiving
funding in the 2024-2029 time band.
2
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2019-1 STM
This request is for $1.5 million for the services of transportation engineers and a public-engagement
specialist to develop that Report for the Hartwell Avenue/Bedford Street area. It will be based on a review
of present and future conditions, including current and projected traffic volumes, traffic management,
safety requirements, signal warrants, and a general operational analysis. Proposed preliminary designs are
expected to include dimensions and cross-sections, horizontal and vertical alignments, and identified
easements and/or land takings. It will explore alternatives for multimodal transportation in the area. The
Report will review previous plans and proposals and examine the feasibility of roundabouts and/or
improved traffic signals and slip lanes at the Bedford/Route 128 and Bedford/Hartwell junctions. The
Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has indicated support for investigating these
concepts.
Hartwell Avenue is Lexington's largest commercial zone, serving as a town and regional hub in an area of
20,000 employees. Its buildings are generally outdated and limited by dimensional and density
restrictions imposed in past years. It presents the best opportunity to grow the Town's commercial tax
base by increasing the density of its development. The Planning Board and staff have been working on an
updated zoning plan for Hartwell for several years and anticipate bringing it to Town Meeting in the
future. However, Town residents, particularly those in the immediate area whose lives are most affected
by the growing congestion, have indicated that any support for such a rezoning initiative would be
contingent on a genuine effort to address the existing and projected traffic problems. Preparation of the
Report would include continuing public input, including formal hearings, before MassDOT considers
approval of a design.
If the 25% Design is approved, the Town will seek additional funding approval from Town Meeting to
bring the design to the 100% level and to prepare applications for Federal monies (to be allocated by the
State) for construction. Because Bedford Street(Route 4/225) is a State road, funding of up to$48 million
may be available. Lexington has already invested almost $9 million in anticipation of this project,
including $7 million for the Hartwell Avenue/Maguire Road intersection and bridge replacement;
$1 million for the ongoing replacement of Hartwell Avenue water mains; and $1 million for safety
improvements to the Bedford Street/Eldred Street pedestrian crossing, a bus shelter, a mixed-use path and
landscaping.
The majority of this Committee supports this funding request as a necessary step to address a significant
problem that has been in discussion for decades. Funding design work to the 25% level is necessary to
understand what level of traffic-congestion mitigation might be achieved and to remain in the queue for
State and Federal funding, hopefully advancing a future project to 2024-2029. However, even if
Lexington were not to receive outside funding going forward, the need to address the traffic problem
remains. The results of this study should be important input to the discussion of potential zoning changes
on Hartwell Avenue, and thus are needed as soon as possible. In short, this study is important to
undertake now to address a problem of long standing, hopefully to advance the timeline for a
construction project to the near future, and to provide critical information to help guide zoning change
discussions
The minority of this Committee is opposed to funding at this time the 25% Design Report. It is deemed
premature because (without priority order):
(1) Nothing has been identified to indicate whether any of the potential changes to be addressed
by the 25% Design Report have been shown in prior applications meaningfully to mitigate an
already severe traffic situation as is Lexington's instant case—especially considered that it is
agreed that even with the current zoning of that area the traffic volume will increase over time.
$1.5 million is far too much to appropriate—even ifjustified(which hasn't been shown)—without
having a reasonable expectation that the current traffic could be mitigated. Just rearranging the
traffic pattern might only reposition the "parking-lot"situation.
(2) It appears that little can be done to materially enhance the safety of the area without further
aggravating the severe traffic problem.
(3) The proposed Project will be addressing future, unspecified, conditions; however, the current,
underway, "Hartwell District Zoning Initiative" proposes a wide range of re-zoning-related,
3
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2019-1 STM
potential changes without having yet done reporting on the increases in traffic accompaning
those changes.
(4) There is no common agreement as to what, or even when, results of that Initiative would be
proposed to a future Town Meeting including whatever land taking would be needed not only
temporarily during construction, but permanently. With the existing long-term leases, the
judgment will be difficult, if even practical, to define a timeline for the proposed changes to be
implemented, the further traffic aggravation to occur, or a reasonable estimate when any
material, enhanced, tax payments would be achieved.
(5) While a 5-year advance in the State's Long Range Transportation Plan would be welcomed,
nothing has been presented that the Town's funding of the proposed 25%Design Report needs to
be at this STM rather than a later Town Meeting. Resolving the above-cited deficiencies and a
further, thorough, education of our residents are appropriate before advancing this proposed
Project to Town Meeting.
Article 9: LED Streetlight Funds Funding Committee
Conversion
Requested Source Recommends
$875,858 GF (Cash) Approve (6-0)
"To see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money for the purposes of acquiring and installing
light emitting diode (LED) streetlights to replace existing streetlights in the Town, and for other costs
incidental or related thereto; determine whether the money will be provided by the tax levy, by transfer
from available funds, by borrowing, grants, donations, gifts, or other available monies or by any
combination of these methods; determine if the Town will authorize the Selectmen to apply for, accept,
expend and borrow in anticipation of state aid for such capital improvements; or act in any other manner
in relation thereto.
"DESCRIPTION: This Article is to fund replacement of the 3000 plus streetlights in Town from
induction lights to the more energy efficient LED lights. The Town is eligible for a state grant to
pay a portion of this conversion cost(approximately 30%)."
(Town Warrant)
The Town intends to replace 3,167 streetlights, mostly 2010-era electromagnetic induction type lights,
with newer LED technology. This includes all the lights in Town except about 60 lights in Town Center
that are either ornamental lights not eligible for this program or lights that will be replaced under the
Center Streetscape project. The total cost includes parts, labor, and disposal for all bulbs and fixtures, and
the Town has received a grant from the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) that will reimburse
$194,764 of that cost if the project is completed by the end of May 2020. The Town also expects another
$96,813 in incentive rebates from Eversource, making the net cost to the Town $584,281. The MAPC
solicits bids and selects contractors for this program. The expected payback on the net project costs is
5.4 years.
Our current induction lights, which have previously replaced older incandescent, mercury vapor, and
metal halide lights, have caused expensive maintenance of about $130,000 a year, due in large part to the
New England weather. LED technology, which has matured greatly in the past few years, is expected to
cut these maintenance costs to about $76,000 a year (still requiring inspections, realignment, sensor
replacement, and accidental damage repair). A warranty will cover the LED bulbs and fixtures for
20 years; the installation will come with the standard one-year warranty.
An expected reduction in annual energy costs from about $122,000 to about $68,000 will be achieved by
replacing 150W, 80W, and 40W bulbs (depending on location on main roads, collectors, or neighborhood
streets) with 70-85W, 30-40W, and 18-24W bulbs, depending on location, number of lights, and
obstructions, which should provide the same or better amounts of light output in all locations. The color
temperature of the induction lights is 4100K-5000K; the LED lights will be in the range of
2500K-3000K. (As an example, 5000K and above is considered daylight; 2700K is considered the color
of incandescent light.)
4