Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
Chairman Hamilton stated that since the project is taking place within the 100 foot buffer <br /> zone then the entire project must abide by the Town of Lexington Wetland Bylaws. <br /> Mr. Beuttell stated that the project is specifically unique in how it relates to the regulations <br /> and asked if the Commission would require stormwater management if a different applicant <br /> were to file with a similar situation. <br /> The Commission discussed how to best navigate the regulations in relation to this project. <br /> Ms. Mullins stated that the carport would have a low wall around the perimeter, which would <br /> help control any spills or leaks from the vehicles parked there. <br /> Mr. Langseth stated that the wetland boundary cannot be confirmed since the wetland <br /> delineation is not noted on a surveyed plot plan. <br /> On a motion by Mr. Beuttell and seconded Mr. Langseth, the Commission voted 4-0 to close <br /> the hearing. <br /> 7:26pm <br /> DEP 201-1144 BL 1101 <br /> NOI, 55 Bridge Street <br /> Applicant: Jian Ye <br /> Project: Raze and rebuild of a single family dwelling <br /> Mr. Rich Kirby, Mr. Jian Ye and Mr. Al Gala presented before the Commission. <br /> Mr. Kirby stated that the applicant is proposing to remove the walls of the existing dwelling <br /> and rebuild while adding an addition, a two car garage and a deck. The driveway is proposed <br /> to be porous pavement. An infiltration system will be located in the rear of the property with a <br /> retaining wall to retain the roughly three feet of fill. The groundwater will be routed <br /> downward by a plastic barrier sheet. The portions of the wetland boundary will be restored <br /> from its current state as lawn area. <br /> Chairman Hamilton read the engineering memo into the record. <br /> Mr. Langseth asked about the configuration of the restoration area. Mr. Langseth asked <br /> whether it would make more sense to have a larger restoration area closer to the wetland <br /> boundary on the left-hand side of the property as opposed to the proposed plan. <br /> Mr. Kirby stated that it was designed as such because there is an existing landscaped area that <br /> the applicant wished to maintain. <br /> Mr. Gala stated that in regards to the outstanding porous pavement comment stated by the <br /> Town Engineer that they have provided pavement details in the submitted plans. The <br />