|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2019-04-29-CONCOM-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Conservation Commission-ConCom
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
2019-04-29-CONCOM-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2019 12:56:33 PM
Creation date
7/8/2019 3:50:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CONCOM - Conservation Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Langseth stated that, though he believes the Commission will have to approve a home in <br />the same footprint, he does not feel comfortable agreeing to confirm a wetland delineation at <br />this property. <br /> <br />Chairman Hamilton stated that this filing is an example of extreme grandfathering. <br /> <br />Mr. Beuttell stated his concerns the wetland line will move once the current dwelling is <br />removed. Mr. Beuttell confirmed that the proposed house will remain in the same footprint as <br />the current dwelling. <br /> <br />Ms. Dillon stated that the proposed house is in the same footprint but will require a new <br />foundation. <br /> <br />Mr. Wolk asked if there were a way in which the applicants could quantify the amount of <br />water runoff they will be producing that will make its way to the neighboring properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Beuttell stated that he believes it will be almost impossible for a satisfactory wetland <br />delineation to be determined. Mr. Beuttell stated that the Commission should think about how <br />the activities will impact the wetland rather than directing the majority of their focus on the <br />delineation line. Mr. Beuttell recommended the applicant consider installing a walkway in the <br />rear of the property. <br /> <br />Ms. Dohan recommended a material that could be walked on such as groundcover rather than <br />an impervious walkway. <br /> <br />The Commission and applicant discussed the zoning setbacks and the possibility of the <br />applicant requesting a variance or special permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals in order <br />to move the proposed dwelling away from the wetland. <br /> <br />Ms. Dohan stated that she would feel comfortable if the applicant asked zoning for a variance <br />or approving the grandfathered footprint. <br /> <br />Mr. Langseth stated that the applicant should reconsider the proposed foundation stones <br />underneath the driveway. Mr. Langseth asked for filter fabric and double washed stone <br />underneath the driveway. <br /> <br />Chairman Hamilton asked if the square footage of the proposed dwelling is the same as the <br />existing square footage. <br /> <br />Ms. Dillon stated that the both existing and proposed houses are about 1,400 square feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Huntington, an abutter, stated that he agreed with the end of the wetland delineation <br />on the edge of the property line. <br /> <br />Ms. Mullins asked if the crawlspace would be lower than the existing slab. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.