Laserfiche WebLink
Page 135 <br /> July 6, 1976 <br /> Multi-Handicapped - Burlington <br /> June 25, 1976 Classified Payroll #20 240.00 <br /> June 30, 1976 Professional Payroll 473.65 <br /> Pre-School (Burlington) <br /> June 25, 1976 Classified Payroll #19 525.00 <br /> June 30, 1976 Professional Payroll 1,771.16 <br /> July 2, 1976 Bill Schedule #22 191.72 <br /> Pre-School - Bedford <br /> June 25, 1976 Bill Schedule #9 74.00 <br /> Title I - P.L. 89-313-Spec. Ed. <br /> June 30, 1976 Professional Payroll 102.89 <br /> ESEA Library <br /> June 25, 1976 Bill Schedule #8 889.08 <br /> A.C.E. Program <br /> July 2, 1976 Bill Schedule #15 764.20 <br /> Adult Education <br /> July 2, 1976 Bill Schedule #11 15.00 <br /> EDCO Magnet <br /> June 25, 1976 Bill Schedule 9,000.00 <br /> Bus Ticket <br /> June 25, 1976 Bill Schedule 804.00 <br /> Dr. Rotberg commented on the recommendation of the department head NEW PERSONNEL <br /> regarding the person recommended for the math-science position at Clarke <br /> Junior High School. Dr. Rotberg felt the ratings by the department head <br /> were un-enthusiastic and wondered if when electing persons to teach in <br /> the Lexington Public Schools there should be persuasive reasons strongly <br /> aligned to excellence rather than recoam:endations that reflected a good <br /> gamble. Miss Quinn responded saying that the choice of words used by <br /> department heads and other references were their own choices, and were <br /> direct quotations. Dr. Rotberg replied saying that he felt that only <br /> superb credentials should be considered with the job market the way it <br /> is. Miss Quinn commented that all candidates that were being recommended <br /> were a result of a convergence of viewpoints. Mr. Michelman said that <br /> it was difficult to know how to interpret phrases used by individuals <br /> since all people had different standards. Mr. Michelman said he had <br /> questions also, but after reviewing the folder of the person and having <br /> a discussion with Miss Quinn was now satisfied. <br /> Dr. Lawson commented that department heads, principals, and central <br /> office staff who interviewed candidates obtained much more vital informa- <br /> tion and feeling about the candidate during the interview than that which <br /> is reflected in some of the written comments. He felt the school com- <br /> mittee should hold us accountable for the production in the classroom <br /> rather than for the selected references. He felt that he was satisfied <br /> after quizzing Mr. Spiris and Miss Quinn in a protracted discussion on <br /> the candidate and would so recommend. <br />