|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1976-05-14-SC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
School Committee-SC
>
Minutes
>
1975-1979
>
1976
>
1976-05-14-SC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2022 3:47:00 PM
Creation date
3/5/2019 3:08:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Schools
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 97 <br /> May 14, 1976 <br /> of vital activities: developing goals and objectives, revitalizing pro- <br /> grams which currently exist, updating curriculum guides, assessing new <br /> materials. This person will not write curriculum, but will manage, plan, <br /> coordinate, evaluate, and change where necessary and will do these tasks <br /> with the help of 'system-wide staff. <br /> Mr. Michelman said that there remained the question of the extent <br /> to which we define objectives and goals, and think about means to achieve <br /> them. <br /> Dr. Lawson responded that there is no question that staff must de- <br /> vise goals and objectives, that staff needs the security of this method <br /> of operating. He stressed that such staff-devised objectives be con- <br /> sistent with system-wide goals and objectives. <br /> Dr. Rotberg commented that there are times when school systems get <br /> excited, and times when they don' t. He cited Dr. Lawson' s diagnosis as <br /> contributing to hopes for excitement for the Lexington Public Schools. <br /> Dr. Rotberg continued with several questions regarding the proposed <br /> position of Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction. <br /> 1) How would the School Committee and administration be able to let <br /> the prospective candidates know the dimensions of the position, <br /> given the proposed central office reorganization and the July 5 <br /> deadline? <br /> 2) If this person is appointed to do the tasks listed, what does <br /> the other Assistant do? <br /> 3) Which one of the two Assistants will do evaluations? <br /> To the first question, Dr. Lawson responded that there are numerous <br /> advantages to having a person "on board" by August 1. <br /> - to begin to know staff, programs, etc. , and not lose time with this <br /> background work in September. <br /> - to perform tasks and create an atmosphere which will convince staff <br /> from the beginning of school of administrative support and concern. <br /> - to establish the person's role on the Central Administration team. <br /> Distribution of tasks, Dr. Rotberg's second question, was difficult <br /> to answer at this time, Dr. Lawson felt. However, he noted that he ex- <br /> pected to work closely with all Central Office staff, and to make changes <br /> where he sees the need. <br /> The question of who will do the evaluating is another one to be <br /> worked out, Dr. Lawson responded. As soon as the new person is in place <br /> andthe administration is functioning as a team, this question can be <br /> answered. <br /> • <br /> l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.