Laserfiche WebLink
Page 96 <br /> May 14, 1976 <br /> A special meeting of the Lexington School Committee was held Friday, <br /> May 14, in the School Administration Building at 3:00 p.m. Present were <br /> Mrs. Swanson, Messrs. Michelman, Wadsworth, and Rotberg. Also present <br /> were Messrs. Spixis and Maclnnes, and Miss Quinn. Dr. John Lawson, who <br /> will assume the position of Superintendent of the Lexington Public Schools <br /> on June 14, 1976 was also in attendance. <br /> The purpose of the meeting was to allow an exchange of ideas between <br /> Dr. Lawson and the members of the School Committee on matters of mutual <br /> concern, especially filling the position of Assistant Superintendent for <br /> Curriculum and Instruction. <br /> Mr. Michelman opened the discussion. He noted that there was little <br /> question of the need to fill such a position, and to do so as expeditiously <br /> as possible. He did feel that some questions do exist, and that airing <br /> of those questions is important as the screening process begins. He cited <br /> several concerns: <br /> - the need for system coordination, coherence, and control vs the <br /> value of diversity, local (school) autonomy. <br /> - the question of internally created curricula vs those commercially <br /> produced. <br /> Dr. Lawson stated that he had obviously not had sufficient time or <br /> exposure to Lexington to allow him to formulate precise responses to <br /> those concerns. He did, however, have several perceptions that he would <br /> like to share. <br /> He noted first that he had reviewed most of the recent reports pre- <br /> sented to the School Committee (ADL, Educational Program Study Committee) <br /> and had met with Central Office Administrators. He added that he had <br /> asked also each principal to reveal what he or she perceived to be the <br /> primary strength and weaknesses of the school system. All of these <br /> sources, plus his awn experience with a major administrative reorganiza- <br /> tion, contributes to his perception of this situation. <br /> Dr. Lawson felt that any change in the structure of central admini- <br /> stration should contribute to the improvement of programs, services and <br /> procedures. He noted that the development of goals and objectives should <br /> precede any changes, and that such development should be based on broad <br /> input from faculty, community, students, and School Committee. Without <br /> such goals, there exists the risk of continual misunderstanding and the <br /> danger of frustration in any attempts at teamwork. Dr. Lawson stated <br /> that he has a strong commitment to "involvement", and that that implies <br /> a need for teamwork at the system level. <br /> There seems to be a fairly strong consensus, Dr. Lawson continued, <br /> that there exists in Lexington a void in the area of curriculum. The <br /> plan to hire an Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, <br /> addresses this need. Dr. Lawson sees this as an essential position for <br /> change--change for the learner, for teachers and administrators, for <br /> the community, because the needs of all these groups are changing. He <br /> sees this person as a facilitator of renewal, helping staff in a number <br />