Laserfiche WebLink
transportation. Jennifer opined that we can identify the few streets that really need <br /> infrastructure, but the will might be the real problem. Joe Pato said both are issues. <br /> Discussion of how this is an uphill battle. <br /> Peggy said she thinks that the appointment of a Bicycle Coordinator as part of a town <br /> staff member's responsibility should be a priority; Joe reminded the group that the BoS <br /> can't tell Town Manager to hire such a person. <br /> On bikeway speed limits/guidelines and posting 15 mph advisory signs: <br /> Kevin recapped the discussion of a speed limit versus safe passing rules and the need <br /> to coordinate with other towns. George suggested that a speed limit should be hours- <br /> based. Both Lou and Richard said they think it will help people. Jennifer said that the <br /> Town shouldn't introduce a speed limit until there are bike lanes on Mass Ave. The red <br /> "Burma Shave" signs were popular and effective ways to relay important messages <br /> about bikeway courtesy. <br /> Bob Hausslein thinks that 15 mph speed limit is ok too. Omar says he doesn't have a <br /> strong opinion but thinks the main issue is "slow when pedestrians are present" is a <br /> good message. Debate over exact wording of sign. <br /> Rails to Trails Conservancy relates there are varying practices and limits on various <br /> national rail-trails. Lou mentions that 15 mph feels right. Kevin is ambivalent about <br /> speed limit vs safe passing and is fine with either; he mentions that he does have an <br /> idea about 15 mph because of his Garmin; likes the idea of having a town-wide <br /> campaign on it. Bob Dangel said that another big problem is the errant behavior of <br /> pedestrians; he thinks that 15 during busy hours" is a possible adaptation. Ross said <br /> he will reach out to his colleagues in other towns to find out what is being considered <br /> elsewhere. <br /> Peggy said the final design for the bike lanes on the Mass Ave corridor are not what <br /> was discussed in the original planning — i.e., there is no buffer between the lane and <br /> the parked car (the right side of the lane is the "T" of the parking lane) — this is less <br /> safe for riders. Ross offered to do a postmortem on what happened with the original <br /> plan for the bike lane on the corridor. <br /> Liaison Reports: <br /> Richard Canale said that the Planning Department is short on staff in planning, hiring is <br /> underway. He attended the Moving Together Conference, saying it was great to hear <br /> all the good bike stuff going on; seems like there is money available and that "we are <br /> falling behind in Lexington." The mentality in Lexington, he said, is "roads are for cars." <br /> Joe Pato mentioned that the Center Streetscape 100% design funds will be voted on <br /> during Spring Town Meeting. <br />