Laserfiche WebLink
the entrance to the property. Therefore, there is a sign now indicating the address as 700 <br /> Waltham St. They use that address for the keeping of the cars. There are 5 buildings on the <br /> property. There was never any work that was done without a permit. It was suggested many <br /> years ago that stakes be put at the corners of the one acre parcel designating the car storage <br /> area. This had been done and Mr. George has inspected the property to confirm that the <br /> operation is only within the 1 acre. The plan they provided indicates that the area is well within <br /> the acre of the permitted area and has remained in that location for the entire period. There had <br /> previously been an issue in regards to gravel trucks parking on the property. Feeney Bros had <br /> been doing some work in Lexington and was parking trucks on the side of the road. Someone <br /> recommended that they park the trucks on the Carroll property instead. Ms. Ricki Pappo had <br /> filed a complaint to Mr. George about this and Mr. George requested the Feeney Bros remove <br /> the trucks, which they did. Over the years, there has always been some sort of equipment on <br /> the property, whether it's haying equipment or tractor-trailers to take the cars. The Fire <br /> Department also uses the property for training purposes on how to extricate someone from a <br /> vehicle in the case of an accident. There was a suggestion that there were gravel trucks on <br /> Allen Street, but there haven't been any trucks on that street in connection to John Carroll. <br /> There was a project on Clematis Street but that's not connected with John Carroll's project. In <br /> 2005, there was an environmental concern raised and the problem was quickly addressed <br /> quickly to the satisfaction of the neighbors. There are monitoring wells that are maintained that <br /> show no releases since 2005 and the area is monitored routinely. The Town of Lexington has <br /> about 11,000 registered cars. The Carroll operation gives people the opportunity to have their <br /> cars taken away, which may be why abandoned cars aren't typically seen around town. Mr. <br /> Carroll also regularly works with the School Department and provides cars for seminars on <br /> safety. There's ample evidence that there is a public good that comes from the operation and <br /> Mr. Dailey requests that the Board renew the permit for a 5 year period. <br /> A Board Member, Mr. Williams, asked for a summary of the Engineering Report (Mr. Borrebach <br /> responded that he has been working as the LSP since November 2017. They conducted 3 <br /> rounds of groundwater sampling on the property. They analyze the soil for oil, petroleum, <br /> PCBs, non-organics, and metals. In 2005 there was a dry well discovered on the property with <br /> oil in it. It was subsequently removed. They did an injection of Hydrogen Peroxide which <br /> removes organics from groundwater. There has been remediation work done. The property <br /> has a designated temporary solution. In order to receive a temporary solution, one can do more <br /> remediation and monitor. It's a common solution in Massachusetts. They have to submit a <br /> report to the DEP every 5 years). <br /> A Board Member, Mr. Clifford, asked what the source of the pollution was (one was a dry well <br /> that had received oil in 2005 in the meadow area. The well was subsequently removed along <br /> with 250 tons of soil. The 2nd area of contamination was where gasoline was stored near the <br /> building. That area was subsequently excavated). Mr. Clifford asked if the dry well was near <br /> where the vehicles were stored (it was in the proximity). Mr. Clifford asked if it is possible that <br /> the oil was from the vehicles (it's extremely difficult to determine the age of oil, so that couldn't <br /> be determined). <br /> An audience member, Ms. Ricki Pappo, 16 Blossomcrest Rd. — Ms. Pappo asked what it will <br /> take to get a permanent solution for the site. She also stated that the original site was not within <br /> the one acre, it was in a different building. The gas was retained onsite for other trucking <br /> businesses and there was some spillage from transferring materials from one place to another. <br /> She has spoken with another engineer from OHI that reviewed the site 5 years ago (Mr. <br /> Borrebach responded that temporary solutions are a very common way to deal with more <br />