Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Board Minutes: January 14, 1985 <br />second to more general requirements of the <br />information desirable to permit a thorough <br />search further the provision of recreation <br />ties such as streets, which are outside the <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, POLICIES <br />Subdivision Rules and Regulations and <br />review. The staff was asked to re - <br />space and connection to public facili- <br />subdivision boundaries. <br />14. Lexington 2000: The Board discussed the proposal by the Board of Selectmen <br />to convene a committee to plan for "Lexington 2000" which Selectmen McLaughlin <br />has described as a "strategic planning" process. Mrs. Smith had a package of <br />material which had been submitted by boards, departments and committees under the <br />Selectmen's jurisdiction. She noted that most of the issues identified will be <br />addressed in a comprehensive plan. <br />The Board was unclear as to what is the focus of Lexington 2000. It was agreed <br />to raise the following questions in the meeting with the Selectmen: What is the <br />relationship of Lexington 2000 to the Planning Board's comprehensive plan? Will <br />there be two parallel planning efforts? Will the Town provide financial support <br />for the Planning Board to continue with its comprehensive planning effort if it <br />is also providing money for Lexington 2000? <br />REPORTS <br />15. Planning Board Members, Subcommittees <br />a. Board of Appeals Hearings: Mrs. Smith reported on the Board of Appeals <br />hearings held on January 10. In contrast with the vigorous neighborhood <br />opposition to the conversion of 225 Waltham Street into a two-family house <br />expressed at the Planning Board meeting of January 7, there was virtually no <br />opposition at the Board of Appeals hearing and the conversion was approved <br />unanimously. The hearing on the roadside stand at 52 Lowell Street pointed <br />to the need for clarification and improvement of the special permit provi- <br />sions dealing with roadside stands in the Zoning By -Law. The Board of <br />Appeals appears to be wavering from its earlier policy of requiring that a <br />certified plot plan be submitted for any yard setback variance or the <br />special permits for non -complying buildings. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 11:18 p.m. <br />GJudith J. Uhr , Clerk <br />1 <br />