1974-12-02 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Page 2 12.2.74 Mr. Briggs' draft letter of appreciation of the Planning Board to D.WHITNEY Douglas Whitney, planning intern, who is leaving the planning office RESIGNATION for a position in Florida, was approved as written and was signed by all members present. Plan submitted with Application Form A74-35 by John Modoono (previ- FORM A74-35 ously submitted and rejected under numbers A74-29 & 30), showing land MODOONO at Webb Street, was reviewed by the Board. Following discussion of WEBB STREET access over lot 94 to Parcel M, it was voted that a notation: "This endorsement, "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law not required", is conditioned upon Lot 94 and Parcel M being and remaining in common ownership. "Dunham Street", as shown on this plan, is not a way as defined in G.L., Ch. 41, Section 81L.", be added to the plan. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: The plan entitled "Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass.", dated November 21, 1974, by Miller & Nylander, submitted on November 23, 1974, by John Modoono with Application Form A74-35, requires no approval under the Subdivision Control Law. It was also voted that the planning director be empowered to endorse the plan on behalf of the Planning, Board, conditional upon addition of the abovementioned notation. Mr. Briggs reported on Mr. Brown's information that no Federal funding FLOOD PRO. would be available to towns designated as having flood prone areas INSURANCE ' without the town's enrollment in the Flood Disaster Protection Insurance program. Information on costs and benefits to Lexington, if enrolled, will be obtained by Mrs. Brown and Mr. Briggs at the December 4 con- ference on Flood Plain Zoning. Announcement of SILC meeting on December 5 in Wilmington was noted. Dr. Clarke reported on his conversation with Acheson Callaghan, Town DRUMMER BOY Counsel, about procedures for submission of definitive plan for Drummer GREEN SUBD. Boy Preen development. The definitive subdivision and road plan may be submitted in phases, as preferred by the developer, but a comprehensive drainage plan will be required. Spaulding & Slye, developers, will be informed by Mr. Briggs to proceed with resubmission of the definitive plan (previously deemed unacceptable by the Planning Board). The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. 1 4Paul.acKenzie. Clerk