|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1971-07-19
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
1971-07-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:42:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:18:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MEETING <br />July 19, 1971 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was called to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />by the chairman, Mrs. Brown with members Clarke, Costello, Lund, planning <br />director Zaleski, planning intern Fennessey and secretary Mrs. Snow present. <br />Also in attendance were Mr. Frank Sandy, Mr. Thomas Curran and Mr. Leonard <br />Notkin. <br />Mr. Harvey Newgent met with the board by appointment at 7:30 to discuss a H. NEWGENT <br />proposal involving the purchasing of 4 lots, including tax -title land on GARFIELD & <br />Garfield and Earle streets which are a portion of the proposed school site EARLE STS. <br />in the Meagherville area. The possibility of developing low-cost housing <br />in the form of approximately 40 apartment units was mentioned. The chair- <br />man requested that Mr. Newgent write a letter to the Planning Board outlin- <br />ing any plans he may develop and that the Selectmen be asked for their views <br />regarding the future of the entire Meagherville tract. <br />Mr. Joseph Prestejohn, Atty. Sumner Darman and Mr. Robert Blech of the Mobil PRESTEJOHN <br />Oil Corp. presented plans for a service station on Bedford St. near Hartwell MOBIL SERV. <br />Ave. Mr. Darman, who spoke for Mr. Prestejohn, the owner of the 11 acre STATION <br />tract which is in CH and CM district, said the plans included construction <br />of a road behind the station as access to the undeveloped land and described <br />provisions for drainage. The need for rezoning of the service station site, <br />need for the 200' setback from Bedford St. now required, construction of a <br />holding pond and possible other requirements for enlarged drainage facilities <br />to accomodate the future development of the rear land were discussed at some <br />' length. As this was considered a preliminary discussion no decision was re- <br />quired of the Planning Board at this time. It was suggested that a definite <br />policy be developed by the Town regarding the back land of this parcel. <br />The minutes of the meeting of the Planning Board on July 12, 1971, were MINUTES 7/12 <br />approved as read. <br />A plan submitted with Application Form A71-13 showing land on Follen Rd. FORM A71-13 <br />was reviewed and upon a motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: <br />That the plan entitled "A Subdivision of Land Court Case No.16684-11", <br />dated May 17, 1971, showing lots on Follen Rd. conveying a small <br />parcel in back in accordance with Board of Appeals variance does <br />not require approval under the Subdivsion Control Law. <br />The plan was so endorsed by members of the Board. <br />A preliminary plan for construction on the Central Block was examined and CENTRAL <br />reviewed by the members. Mr. LUnd and Mr. Notkin reported that they had BLOCK <br />attended an informal preliminary meeting of the Historic District Comm. <br />regarding these plans and both expressed disapproval of several aspects as <br />shown in the drawings. It was agreed that the entrance and egress were in- <br />adequate for traffic safety and that as defined in the Zoning By -Law for CB <br />district, an additional 10 ft. yard would be required to the rear of the <br />building. The members expressed concern about the appearance of the pro- <br />posed building.because of its proximity to the Battle Green and felt that <br />the proposed building would not harmonize with the character of this area. <br />The matter of the underground and street level parking was also discussed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.