1958-09-04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

a -4-5g -2- as the Planning Board was concerned if a doctor had an office in his home, then had moved elsewhere but had continued to have an office in his former residence, the building had become commercialized. The place was part of his business. He used it to make his income. There was no difference in a situation as far as commercialized aspects were concerned wherein people came to such an office or one located in a down -town business district. Mr. Jaquith concluded by stating that it was the Planning Board's purpose to prevent such commercialized use from becoming town -ride in residential districts. Mrs. Mooney asked if such a purpose would not en- danger the future of other doctors who would like to locate offices in residences in Lexington. Mr. Jaquith stated that it was the intent of the Board to prevent pro- fessional persons from commercializing residential property because they wol.,.ld to enjoined with legal technicalities. Messrs. McCormack and Tropeano and Drs. Mooney and Bellinger discussed the problems of locating a _professional office building; in Lexington, or re -zoning land for such use, and related problems. Mr. McCormack asked if the long-range result of the Planning Board's amendment would not be the filing of oet1tions seeking re -zoning of land ' for general business. Mr. Jaquith pointed out that there were two fine professional office buildings, both well -located in resi- dential areas in town. He said that the matter in regard to the future location of similar buildings was of deep concern to the Planning Board. He stated that the Board believed the location of professional buildings should be referred to a town meeting by means of a zoning amendment rather than be decided by a five -member Board of Appeals. Mr. Russian asked if there had been any unfortunate instances of the Board of Appeals granting permission for office buildings under the existing by-law. Mr. Jaquith said that he did not know of an -r. Mr. Nickerson stated that the Board of Appeals had been criticized in two in- stances where whole buildinms had become devoted to doc- tors' offices, etc. under permissive use. He said it was the full intent of said board to specif'T what rooms may be used for office use . T_t was also the Boar(' Is intent to prevent professional offices being located where traffic would 'c e a ms jor consideration. Mr. Potter inquired if the re -zoning of a lot in a residential district for a professional office building ' was considered to be spot zonin(-. Mr. Jaquith replied that he believed It would be so considered.