|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1958-09-04
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1950-1959
>
1958
>
1958-09-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:42:11 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:17:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Donald E. Nickerson, William G. Potter, Stephen T. Russian ' <br />and Alfred P. Tro.oeano. Mr. Wilbur M. Jaquith of the Plan- <br />ning Board commented on the remarks or answered the ques- <br />tions. <br />Mr.1,1ay asked if Lexington physicians.who had <br />offices in their present homes were compelled to con- <br />tinue to live in their homes in order to keep their <br />permits for professional offices. He pointed out that <br />perhaps a physician had resided in a house which is now <br />too small for his present needs and wishes to move to <br />another area but does not wish to move his office. He <br />asked if there were a time limit on the permits. <br />Mr. Jaquith replied that if a doctor had a permit <br />for an office in his residence for ten,years and changed <br />his residence to another location, he would have to ob- <br />tain a permit to continue to use a portion of his former <br />residence as an office. Mr. Jaquith commented that a <br />doctor should be willing to reside in the house where <br />his office is incidental to residence and not establish <br />an office in a residence just for business. <br />Mr. Tropeano asked if when a doctor wished to <br />locate an office in a residence, whether or not it would <br />make any difference if it were his family or some other I which lived in the residence. <br />Mr. Jaquith said it would make a difference, the <br />professional person having to reside In the dwelling as <br />stated in the Planning Board proposal. He stated that <br />it was the custom in olden days to have an office in the <br />home, that the Board wanted to permit professional per- <br />sonnel to continue that custom in the future, but wanted <br />to discontinue - and, if possible, eliminate - in resi- <br />dential districts the conversion into office use houses <br />which are not being used for residences. <br />Dr. Mooney inquired as to the meaning of the use <br />of a dwelling as an office of a professional person and <br />as incidental to such residence. Mr. Jaquith stated <br />that incidental meant a minor part of a residence, not, <br />for example, eight rooms for office purposes and only <br />one or two for residence. Dr. Mooney commented that <br />space for equipment, examining and waiting rooms, extra <br />bathroom, etc. could not be incidental to residential <br />use. To which Mr. Jaquith replied that if all this space <br />were utilized in the average residence, the building <br />would have become commercialized. <br />Commenting on Dr. Mooneyts further statement that ' <br />a doctor is not a businessman, Mr. Jaquith stated as far <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.