1958-06-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

0-16-58 Lots B-1 and B-3 as shown on the Longfellow Estates ' Section One subdivision plan from the restrictions in the conditional approval contract referred to on said plan. Mr. Stevens presented an instrument he had drafted, at the request of the Board, setting forth such a release. Thereupon, upon motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously VOTED: that the Board sign an instrument entitled "Lexington Planning Board Release from Restric- tions of Conditional Approval Contract," dated June 16, 1958, and release only Lots B-1 and B-3 shown on the Subdivision Plan entitled "Longfellow Estates Section One Lexington, Mass.", dated July 10, 1957, from the restrictions as to sale and building specified in the Condi- tional Approval Contract executed by Nathan Ribock and dated September 101 1957• Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was also unanimously VOTED: that the Board determines that the plans accom- anying Form A applications #58-39, #58-401 and 58-41 do not require approval and that said plans be signed bearing the endorsement "Lex- ington Planning Board approval under the Subdi- vision Control Law not required." GLASS Mr. Snow reported that he had examined the possi- bility of relocatin the public passageway easement ex- KINEEN tending across lot 9 in the Flintlock Ridge Section One PARK subdivision. (See minutes of the April 28, 1958 Plan - PASSAGEWAY ning Board meeting.) He stated that in his opinion the EASEMENT location of the existing easement in relation to the - living area of the Glass residence decreased the value FLINTLOCK of the property. He also said that topographical con - RIDGE ditions in the vicinity of the common boundary between SEC. 1 Kineen Park and the southwesterly corner of said lot were such that he believed it would be difficult to develop a pleasing passageway. He recommended that the easement be relocated immediately southerly of and coinciding with the northerly boundary of lot 5. Mr. Snow stated that in his opinion such a location would not interfere with the use of house lots or the devel- opment of an appropriate passageway. After discussing these matters the Board decided to Grant Mr. Glass' request that the passageway be shifted to the northerly boundary of his property. The