|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1957-01-28
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1950-1959
>
1957
>
1957-01-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:42:12 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:16:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tions to be heard except those of Richard H. Singleton <br />' and the F.P.Morgan Co. <br />Mr. Singleton wished to maintain a toolhouse <br />abutting the rear lot line located at 379 Woburn Street <br />It was decided to oppose the variance requested in the <br />petition and to submit to the Board of Appeals a letter <br />setting forth the Planning Board's reasons for such <br />opposition.* <br />p ositiomber l9 et <br />said letter <br />tobe similar to the Board's <br />opposing an earlier petition <br />of Mr. Singleton. <br />The petition of the F.P.Morgan Company sought <br />permission to erect an $' x 10' real estate sign on <br />property controlled by Stephen Hopkins et al on the <br />southwest side of the intersection of Route 128 and <br />Massachusetts Avenue. The Board decided to oppose the <br />granting of the permission requested and to submit to <br />the Board of Appeals a letter in which it was stated <br />that the Planning Board believes that a sign such as <br />is proposed is out of keeping with the standards Lex- <br />ington is trying to maintain in regard to signs, that <br />the Board sees no reason for a larger sign in the lo- <br />cation referred to in the petition than is allowed for <br />real estate signs in other R 1 districts, and that at <br />' the present time the land is not being subdivided for <br />residential purposes so that a sign of the size per- <br />mitted under Section 6 (f) of the Zoning By-law is not <br />necessary. <br />The secretary was dismissed at 9:45 p.m. at which <br />time the Board met with the Appropriation Committee to <br />discuss the Board's budget for the coming year. The <br />Board adjourned at 10:30 p.m. after it had left its <br />meeting with said committee. <br />Levi G. Burnell, Jr. <br />Clerk <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.