|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1931-11-02
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
1930-1939
>
1931
>
1931-11-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 2:07:39 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 3:16:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Planning Board
Department
Planning
Keywords or Subject
PB-1 to PB-24, 1918-1988 Planning Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. <br />It does not made any difference to Lexington which road <br />is put through. The Marsh Street route is the best as far as <br />engineering goes. It was suggested that the Board join with <br />the Arlington people and save Marsh Street when the Spring Street <br />route could be used just as well. <br />At the hearing, Mr. Pillsbury asked if there was anyone <br />representing the Lexington Planning Board. Mr. Cosgrove informed <br />him that the Lexington Planning Board favored the Spring Street <br />route since it was being treated as a through highway to Concord <br />and not a local project; that the Board did not want it to stop <br />at Boi man Street. <br />It was decided to wait until we received further informa- <br />tion before we are celled upon to give action. <br />A letter was read from S. R. Wrightington in which he ex" <br />pressed his opinion as to the extent to which the Town, in develop- <br />ing the project of Vine Brook Drainage, may make takings by <br />eminent domain for highway and drainage purposes while postpon- <br />ing actual construction. <br />The project should be presented to the Town as a whole <br />and the town's interest would be safeguarded by a layout, so <br />that it would still be there when the town sees fit to construct. <br />If the lower end were constructed, the balance is left as a <br />guide for those who are going to carry it out later. It was <br />suggested that the lower end below Mass. Avenue be done one <br />year and the next year it could be carried through to the south <br />and south west. <br />The only land it would damage is Mr. Burnham's. The <br />brook would be three feet lower and his land is five or six feet <br />above it now, and this might make it impossible for farming. <br />The Drainage Act, Chapter 263, Acts of 1926, under which <br />the Town is given authority to make takings for the purpose of <br />surface or ground drainage to improve brooks, etc. was read and <br />discussed. <br />If roads and drains are mixed up, you will enter into <br />two different things. If a road is planned, lay it out as a <br />road, and if a drain is planned, lay it out as a drain. You <br />cannot make a layout for drainage purposes but you can for <br />streets. <br />It was stated that there was no need for a road below <br />the Trotting Park or the intersection of Utica Street although <br />there is plenty of opportunity for a layout of streets below <br />that point. Vine Brook <br />It was also suggested that at some future date a road Project <br />should come up from Paple Street through the nursery to Vtoburn <br />Street between Vine and Utica Streets and continue northwest <br />across Vine Brook in back of Granny Hill to Adams Street along <br />the line of the sewer. <br />It was decided that it would be impossible to proceed <br />any further until we had received plans of :the la tout . <br />It was suggested that we lay out lines with what <br />seems to be a reasonable and proper margin along both sides <br />of the brook, then la-, out a street along both sides, ta'.ce <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.