Laserfiche WebLink
3. <br />what is necessary for drainage and then take for a street if <br />it is wanted. It would be wrong to take for drainage and not <br />make any allowance for a street along there. <br />If a double-barreled highway is constructed, it would <br />be necessary to build twice as much roadway to serve the same <br />number of houses. If a road is put along the brook, the houses <br />will front on the brook, but if the road is not there, the <br />houses will back on it. <br />The Town Engineer presented a plan of Griswold's develop- <br />ment on Minter Street to the Board. This matter was brought up <br />some time ago, and it was decided that the Board would not <br />approve it unless it was changed. At the time, the Board wantod <br />to make a change and 1-r. Griswold refused; he said he could correct <br />the grading and the Board stated that they would approve it if <br />he did so. The people are now asking for water up there and <br />were told that they would have to get together with the Griswolds <br />to get the Board of Survey to approve it. The Planning Board <br />was asked if they approved what had been laid out, and the Chair- <br />man stated that they did not approve any part of it, and did Griswold's <br />not recommend the acceptance of it without further study. If Development <br />the water is put in, there will never be any chance to change it. <br />It was suggested that a better line, grade and approach <br />to connect with Grove Street could be worked out because there <br />is so much undeveloped land there. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P. b:. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Clerk �L <br />f <br />