|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1961-11-14
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1961
>
1961-11-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:52:51 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:30:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stevens: <br />Soule: <br />Ripley: <br />Stevens: <br />Ripley: <br />Stevens: <br />Ripley: <br />Stevens: <br />Soule: <br />Ripley: <br />Stevens: <br />Nickerson: <br />Norriss <br />Stevens: <br />Norris: <br />-3 - <br />In some places they have different boards. <br />Sometimes they have two hearings. Can we take <br />As this particular thing stands, can we act on <br />Yes. You can deny it. <br />Can we either grant or deny it? Can we act on it or not at all? <br />You can dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction. <br />If we can act on it at all, we canact on it either way? <br />No. If they came and asked to vary the control law. <br />If they can neither deny or approve, I would think they would have to act <br />as having lack of jurisdiction to approve.a subdivision. <br />If we can't act both ways, then it should not have come to us at all. <br />It shouldn't have come to you. <br />I would say we automatically deny it because xe can't grant it. <br />Don't we just dismiss it? <br />They have asked for a coning variance. If you deny at this time on the <br />grounds that it involves a subdivision. <br />Couldn't we suggest they come to the Planning Board? <br />Stevens: They have asked for a variance and I don't think you should grant a <br />subdivision based on a subdivision which hasn't been approved. <br />Ripleyt I don't see how we have any rights with it at all. <br />Norris: They are asking us to consider a variance on something that isn't proper. <br />Thgyr don't qualify for the hearing that they requested. <br />Stevens: They ought to come down here for a determination. <br />Ballard: People coma to us with a petition of sorts which Pairs. Brodhead may help <br />them write. When the:;next person comes can she automatically send them <br />to the Planning Board? <br />Nickerson: I want to prevent this from going on too long. We have the right to <br />deny it because they have asked for something we can't grant. I shall <br />ask the Board to send their check back. <br />Stevens As their attorney he went to the wrong board. <br />Nickerson: We can deny it. <br />Stevens: They can come back the' neat day. <br />Ballard: We deiW it on the basis of the lot frontage and advise them ab <br />subdivision situation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.