Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />Nickerson: <br />2- <br />Hickerson: If we deny this should we write a letter to these people and return their <br />$15 and tell them their coming before us was in error? <br />Snow: I made this material after we saw the notice before the hearing at the <br />Board of Appeals. <br />Nickerson: I think we will settle that matter ourselves. <br />Ripley: Is it definite in your mind that this board could not grant this petition? <br />Should we have had it all? <br />Stevens: They should have been told that this is a subdivision and sent to the <br />Planning Board. <br />Ripley: We ;can't grant it? <br />Nickerson: If it had been approved by the Planning Board we could have granted it. <br />Stevens: If the Planning Board has endorsed it, but the lots do not meet the zoning, <br />than it comes before you for the variance. If they want to treat it as <br />a subdivision they could refuse their endorsement. They might come and <br />oppose the granting of it. <br />Meyer: Hear can we say that it is not a subdivision when it is a subdivision? <br />Stevens: You have got legislation written by non -experts that has got to be <br />interpreted so it will work. <br />Nickerson: I would li)w to ask the Planning Board if when we communicate with this <br />person we should advise him that he should come before the Planning Board. <br />Stevens: You have to say it is a subdivision which requires Planning Board approval. <br />(construction?) <br />Soule: If we had the public tearing the .... could be done on the subdivision <br />control law. If we felt that this turn -around could be less than 1201 <br />and so varied our regulations to make it legal it would have to go before <br />the Board of Appeals. If we held to the'1201 it would never appear before <br />the Board of Appeals. <br />Ripley- I still don't know where we stand. <br />Snow: (Refers.to letter of 1957) It seems that the only time we would not act <br />on a plan would be when it was on an accepted street and someone was asking <br />for a variance on frontage or size of the lot. Technically, that is a <br />subdivision. <br />Stevens; If it is a subdivision the Building Inspector is not supposed to issue a <br />' building permit. <br />Meyer: Is there any way for the Board of Appeals to distinguish zoning variances <br />from subdivision control variances? <br />Stevens: They should have to point out chapter and verse of what they are trying to <br />get a variance from. The notices should indicate what it is they are <br />trying to do. <br />Soule: Boston distinguishes between the structure of appeals. <br />